Expert testimony was not required and the jury should have been permitted to evaluate plaintiff's personal-injury claims based on res ipsa loquitur principles.
Font Size:
![]()
N.J. SUPERIOR COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION
Mayer v. Once Upon a Rose Inc.
New Jersey Law Journal
January 31, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New Jersey Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

