New Jersey Law Journal Home
  • Home
  • Advertise
  • Find a Job
  • Books
  • CLE
  • Daily Decision Service
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Smart Litigator

Home › San Francisco Judges OK Pay Bump for Unionized Employees

Font Size: increase font decrease font

San Francisco Judges OK Pay Bump for Unionized Employees

By Cynthia Foster All Articles 

The Recorder

December 7, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
dollar stoplight

credit: Photographer's Choice RF/Art Grafts

Trial court judges voted to ratify a labor deal that will give most unionized court employees in San Francisco a 3 percent pay increase and a one-time $3,500 bonus. That will cost the court $4.7 million, but court officials say that's completely offset by a reduction in the amount they'll be required to contribute for pension and health care plans.

The new contracts represent a reversal of fortunes, both for the unions and the court. Earlier this year, the court proposed, and then unilaterally imposed, a 5 percent cut on some unionized employees. And last year, San Francisco had to go to the Judicial Council and plead for an emergency loan as it sought to bring its costs in line with cuts to its budget.

Court executive officer T. Michael Yuen said that after making painful cuts, including eliminating 11 commissioner positions and closing six courtrooms, San Francisco has steadied its finances and can afford the bonuses. It paid back the loan this summer. And this year the governor included a provision requiring local courts to surrender unspent reserves.

Still, the raises could become a headache for Yuen and the local judges. Last year, some on the Judicial Council said San Francisco was to blame for its budget shortfalls and suggested its employees were overpaid.

Councilman David De Alba, a Sacramento County Superior Court judge, said Wednesday that it will "not go unnoticed" that San Francisco Superior Court has money to spend on wage hikes while many other county courts "barely have enough money to keep doors open."

Steve Stallone, a spokesman for employees represented by the Service Employees International Union, said Tuesday's ratification was expected. But he disputed the notion that court officials had won reductions in pension contributions, saying those adjustments were required by law and not a part of the negotiations.

The new contract is effective as of November 13 for SEIU members. The contract with the other three unions, including the court reporters' union and a managers' union, will go into effect early next year. A court official said the $3,500 bonuses will be paid out early next year as well.



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • San Francisco Superior Court
  • Sacramento County Superior Court
  • Judicial Council
  • Service Employees International Union

Key categories

    
  • State and Local Courts

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Circuit Voids $3 Million Judgment Against Girls Gone Wild Producer
    •      
  2. Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw
    •      
  3. Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System
    •      
  4. Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

About njlj.com   |   Contact njlj.com   |   Advertise with Us   |   Site Map
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media