New Jersey Law Journal Home
  • Home
  • Advertise
  • Find a Job
  • Books
  • CLE
  • Daily Decision Service
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Smart Litigator

Home › Australian Court Rules S&P, Bank Misled on Derivatives

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Australian Court Rules S&P, Bank Misled on Derivatives

By Tom Brennan All Articles 

The Asian Lawyer

November 7, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Flag of Australia/clipart.com 2012

Flag of Australia/clipart.com 2012

An Australian Federal Court judge has ruled against rating agency Standard & Poor's and the wholesale division of Dutch bank ABN AMRO for their role in the sale of "grotesquely complicated" financial products which plummeted in value during the global financial crisis.

The suit was brought by 12 municipalities in New South Wales that are seeking to recover more than $15 million in losses after purchasing synthetic derivatives known as constant proportion debt obligations, or CPDOs, which were created by ABN AMRO's wholesale division and given S&P's highest AAA rating in 2006. Local Government Financial Services (LGFS), an investment manager for local government authorities that sold CPDOs to the 12 municipalities, is also a defendant in the case.

ABN AMRO's wholesale division was subsequently acquired by RBS.

Judge Jayne Jagot ruled that ABN AMRO, S&P and LFGS had all engaged in "misleading and deceptive" conduct in the packaging and rating of the CDPOs. She wrote in her decision that "no reasonably competent ratings agency" could have rated the derivatives AAA.

Piper Alderman Sydney partner Amanda Banton, who represented the plaintiffs, hailed the decision. "This is a major blow to the ratings agencies, which for years have had the benefit of profiting from the assignment of these ratings without ever being accountable to investors for those opinions," he said.

S&P told the Financial Times it would appeal the decision. "We are disappointed with the court's decision, we reject any suggestion our opinions were inappropriate and we will appeal the Australian ruling, which relates to a specific CPDO rating," the agency said. RBS said it was studying the decision.

Banton also represented the plaintiffs in another class action decided in September. In that case, the Australian Federal Court handed down a more than $200 million decision against Lehman Bros.' local subsidiary for selling similarly complex financial products to 72 municipalities, churches and community organizations.

Both cases were backed by litigation funder IMF (Australia) Ltd. Executive director John Walker says IMF is presently exploring other potential claims regarding issues of CPDOs in Europe that were sold by ABN AMRO and rated by S&P.



Subscribe to The Asian Lawyer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • AAA
  • CPDOs
  • Australia
  • The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc
  • CDPOs
  • Local Government Financial Services
  • International Monetary Fund
  • S&P Company
  • New South Wales Company Ltd.
  • Federal Court
  • Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
  • Financial Times Inc.
  • Standard & Poor's Limited

Key categories

    
  • Securities

Most viewed stories

    
  1. 'U.S. News' Top Law Schools Fall Short on Diversity
    •      
  2. Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw
    •      
  3. Citing Potential Conflict, Cahill Resigns From Rutgers Probe
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. No Crime-Fraud Exception to Marital Privilege, Court Finds
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Employment Lawyer From N.J. Is Newest EEOC Commissioner
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Advertising   |   About njlj.com   |   Classifieds   |   Professional Announcements   |   Register for Emails   |   Reprints
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media