New Jersey Law Journal Home
  • Home
  • Advertise
  • Find a Job
  • Books
  • CLE
  • Daily Decision Service
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Smart Litigator

Home › Australian Court Rules S&P, Bank Misled on Derivatives

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Australian Court Rules S&P, Bank Misled on Derivatives

By Tom Brennan All Articles 

The Asian Lawyer

November 7, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Flag of Australia/clipart.com 2012

Flag of Australia/clipart.com 2012

An Australian Federal Court judge has ruled against rating agency Standard & Poor's and the wholesale division of Dutch bank ABN AMRO for their role in the sale of "grotesquely complicated" financial products which plummeted in value during the global financial crisis.

The suit was brought by 12 municipalities in New South Wales that are seeking to recover more than $15 million in losses after purchasing synthetic derivatives known as constant proportion debt obligations, or CPDOs, which were created by ABN AMRO's wholesale division and given S&P's highest AAA rating in 2006. Local Government Financial Services (LGFS), an investment manager for local government authorities that sold CPDOs to the 12 municipalities, is also a defendant in the case.

ABN AMRO's wholesale division was subsequently acquired by RBS.

Judge Jayne Jagot ruled that ABN AMRO, S&P and LFGS had all engaged in "misleading and deceptive" conduct in the packaging and rating of the CDPOs. She wrote in her decision that "no reasonably competent ratings agency" could have rated the derivatives AAA.

Piper Alderman Sydney partner Amanda Banton, who represented the plaintiffs, hailed the decision. "This is a major blow to the ratings agencies, which for years have had the benefit of profiting from the assignment of these ratings without ever being accountable to investors for those opinions," he said.

S&P told the Financial Times it would appeal the decision. "We are disappointed with the court's decision, we reject any suggestion our opinions were inappropriate and we will appeal the Australian ruling, which relates to a specific CPDO rating," the agency said. RBS said it was studying the decision.

Banton also represented the plaintiffs in another class action decided in September. In that case, the Australian Federal Court handed down a more than $200 million decision against Lehman Bros.' local subsidiary for selling similarly complex financial products to 72 municipalities, churches and community organizations.

Both cases were backed by litigation funder IMF (Australia) Ltd. Executive director John Walker says IMF is presently exploring other potential claims regarding issues of CPDOs in Europe that were sold by ABN AMRO and rated by S&P.



Subscribe to The Asian Lawyer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • AAA
  • CPDOs
  • Australia
  • The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc
  • CDPOs
  • Local Government Financial Services
  • International Monetary Fund
  • S&P Company
  • New South Wales Company Ltd.
  • Federal Court
  • Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
  • Financial Times Inc.
  • Standard & Poor's Limited

Key categories

    
  • Securities

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Middlesex Judge Suspended After Arrest for Harboring a Fugitive
    •      
  2. Lawyer Suspended Two Years for Gaming Bankruptcy Court Process
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  3. Lawyer Vanishes, Leaving Firm With Detritus of Suit vs. Ford
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Court Sets Down Procedure for Discovery in Child Porn Cases
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

About njlj.com   |   Contact njlj.com   |   Advertise with Us   |   Site Map
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media