The discovery that the corporate defendant received under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(C)(ii) was adequate and in keeping with the standards of the rule, and the court did not err in its jury instructions; defendants' convictions are affirmed.
U.S. THIRD CIRCUIT
United States v. Maury
New Jersey Law Journal
September 20, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New Jersey Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.