Because Indian Reorganization Act § 465 encompasses land's use, neighbors to the use — such as petitioner — are reasonable, predictable challengers of the Department of the Interior's land acquisition decisions, and their interests, whether economic, environmental or aesthetic, come within the statute's regulatory ambit.
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak
New Jersey Law Journal
June 20, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New Jersey Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.