Indianapolis had a rational basis for refusing to issue refunds to homeowers who had paid a sewer assessment under a plan that was later abandoned in favor of a bonding system and thus did not violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Font Size: 
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Armour v. City of Indianapolis
New Jersey Law Journal
June 6, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New Jersey Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
