The Federal Communications Commission's interpretation of its regulations — i.e., that an incumbent local exchange carrier, to satisfy its duty under Telecommunications Act § 251(c)(2), must make its existing entrance facilities available to competitors at cost-based rates if they are to be used for interconnection — is reasonable and entitled to judicial deference.
Font Size: 
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Talk America Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
New Jersey Law Journal
June 15, 2011
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New Jersey Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
