The Commerce Department's treatment of feed-uranium transactions as sales of goods rather than services reflects a permissible interpretation and application of § 1673 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which calls for antidumping duties on foreign merchandise sold in the United States at less than its fair value.
U.S. SUPREME COURT
United States v. Eurodif S.A. et al., etc.
New Jersey Law Journal
January 27, 2009
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New Jersey Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.