A cause of action for creditor fraud does not exist, and plaintiffs who allege fraud must prove both reliance and misrepresentation; the scenarios to which courts have applied the creditor fraud label are remediable by way of other causes of action; where the bank alleged that the debtor's attorney advised him to transfer assets and issued a misleading opinion letter, the attorney may be liable for conspiracy to violate the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and for misrepresentation.
July 04, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
N.J. Supreme Court
A-5/6 September Term 2003; Supreme Court; opinion by Long, J.; decided June 27, 2005. On certification to the Appellate Division, 360 N.J. Super. 414 (App. Div. 2003). [Sat below: Judges Wefing, Lisa and Fuentes in the Appellate Division; Judge Cook in the Law Division.] DDS No. 04-1-0770
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
