LTN Law Technology News
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Commentary
  • Surveys
  • Events
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • About LTN
  • Register
  • Topics:
  • E-Discovery & Compliance
  • Litigation Support
  • Practice Management
  • Office Tech
  • Mobile Lawyer
  • Research & Libraries
  • Tech Law

Home > Sen. Rockefeller Hears CEO Support for Cybersecurity Legislation

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Sen. Rockefeller Hears CEO Support for Cybersecurity Legislation

By Catherine Dunn Contact All Articles 

Corporate Counsel

February 7, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Sen. Jay Rockefeller

Sen. Jay Rockefeller

Ask U.S. companies for their thoughts on cybersecurity and, if you're Senator Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., you shall receive. Some 300 of the biggest corporations in the country have given the senator their views on proposed cybersecurity legislation that met a bitter defeat last summer — with many voicing support for voluntary collaboration with the federal government, while eschewing a "one-size-fits-all" approach to corporate cybersafeguards.

So say the results of a questionnaire that Senator Rockefeller sent to all CEOs of the Fortune 500 last September, after a Republican-led filibuster blocked the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 from coming to a vote. Rockefeller's committee released its assessment of those responses — along with a sampling of quotes from the answers he received — as legislators gird for another attempt at getting cybersecurity legislation passed this year.

According to a recent staff memo from the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, which Rockefeller chairs, "The concerns raised about the legislation were not about whether the government should have a role with respect to cybersecurity, but about the specifics of that role and what impact that role would have on how companies respond to their cybersecurity challenges."

The 2012 bill met with heavy opposition from lobbyists, particularly the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In a letter sent to senators last July, the Chamber urged members of Congress "to not complicate or duplicate existing industry-driven security standards with government mandates and bureaucracies, even if they are couched in language that would mischaracterize these standards as 'voluntary.'"

In turn, Rockefeller took the unusual step of soliciting opinions directly from Fortune 500 firms. He inquired about their own cybersecurity practices, as well as their views on the 2012 legislation, and the possibility of a voluntary program to allow the government and private sector to coordinate on best practices.

The query elicited responses from more than 80 percent of the top 100 companies, and approximately 300 responses in total. According to the memo, the staff of the committee's majority members determined that "the Chamber of Commerce's vehement opposition to the legislation was not shared by many companies in the private sector."

All respondents said they have developed practices to protect company infrastructure from attacks, drawing on compliance with existing laws, benchmarking by third-party audit firms, and assistance from trade groups.

Depending on the respondent's industry, companies also cited their participation in "government programs designed by sector-specific agencies" with regulatory authority, according to the memo, including the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of the Treasury, and the Federal Communications Commission.

"Your concern over the government's 'ad hoc' approach was also shared by companies that provided responses," the majority staff informed Senator Rockefeller.

Respondent CEOs also voiced support for both collaboration, sans government mandates, and information sharing. "Many companies supported a voluntary program to protect critical infrastructure, so long as it would not become mandatory," the memo states. And, "nearly every company that provided a thorough response expressed support for more robust, two-way cyber threat information sharing, with greater access to security clearances to ease the process," the committee staff found.

But corporations expressed wariness, too, about "the potential development of an inflexible, 'one-size-fits-all' set of best practices," the memo states. Financial services and electric-sector companies "in particular expressed concern that their existing regulatory relations would be disrupted."

Reacting to the findings, a spokesperson for the Chamber continued to voice skepticism about voluntary standards, Reuters reports. "Whether a new cybersecurity program is labeled regulatory or 'voluntary,' the fact is, government officials will have the final word on the standards and practices that industry must adopt, which the Chamber opposes," said Ann Beauchesne, the group's vice president of national security and emergency preparedness.

The committee, though, sounds ready for another round of legislation. "The concerns with such a program were generally related to the manner in which it would be implemented," the staff found, "not with the fundamental notion of whether to create it."



Subscribe to Corporate Counsel

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Senate Committee on Commerce
  • Reuters AG
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Key categories

    
  • Law Firm Management

Most viewed stories

    
  1. iPad Competition Heats Up
    •      
  2. Gartner Announces E-Discovery Leaders in 'Magic Quadrant'
    •      
  3. How to Pick the Best Cloud
    •      
  4. YesLaw Integrates With LexisNexis CaseMap and TextMap
    •      
  5. 12-on-12 What to Read When the Heat Arrives
    •      
  6. Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting
    •      
  7. Corporate Cyberattacks Come Out of the Shadows
    •      
  8. Microsoft Office on iPhone, More Tech Briefs
    •      
  9. 7 Cybersecurity, Forensics Tools to Watch
    •      
  10. 5 Data Breach Risks You Can Prevent
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

3rd Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Texas DA Faces Removal Suits Over DWI, Alleged Misconduct
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About LTN   |
  • Contact LTN   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media