LTN Law Technology News
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Commentary
  • Surveys
  • Events
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • About LTN
  • Register
  • Topics:
  • E-Discovery & Compliance
  • Litigation Support
  • Practice Management
  • Office Tech
  • Mobile Lawyer
  • Research & Libraries
  • Tech Law

Home > War of the Words: Pleaded vs. Pled

Font Size: increase font decrease font

In Practice

War of the Words: Pleaded vs. Pled

Friends debate the past tense of 'plea' but agree it's never correct to say, 'He plead the Fifth'

By John Chandler and Brian Boone All Articles 

Daily Report

January 16, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 
Photo of John Chandler

John Chandler is a senior litigation partner at King & Spalding and a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers.

Photo of Brian Boone

Brian Boone is a senior litigation associate at Alston & Bird and, as he likes to say it, is a more handsome, conservative John Chandler. John is a Democrat. Brian is a Republican. Both love crack writing.

Click here to take a Daily Report survey about  your preference: "pled" or "pleaded."

As lawyers, we get to debate some of the most pressing questions of our time: the limits of Congress's commerce power; the reach of the Due Process Clause; "pleaded" versus "pled."

Yes, you read that right: There is a bitter, friend-splitting debate raging among lawyers about whether to use "pleaded" or "pled." (For our part, we almost ended up at Weehawken over the row.) Both words get a lot of play in legal writing. We think that it's time for one usage to rule them all — but we disagree about which word to send to the dustbin. Chandler always uses "pled." Boone always uses "pleaded." The gloves are off.

But first, some context. We (Chandler and Boone) appreciate good writing, including a conversational tone. We both detest legalese — our jargon detectors go off when we see "herein," "instant case," or "prior to." Neither of us starts sentences with "However" — "But" is better. But on pleaded-pled we disagree.

Here are our competing views:

CHANDLER'S VIEW

(The minority view — or as Boone calls it, the "you've-watched-too-many-episodes-of-Law & Order" view):

Use "pled." Boone needs to get out more — "pleaded" may seem fine on paper, but lawyers chuck the word when they head to court. A lawyer arguing a motion to dismiss doesn't say, "They haven't pleaded scienter." He says, "They haven't pled scienter."

I know, I know: Bryan Garner says that "pleaded" is the "predominant form in American English."1 But does the guy listen to people talk? Nobody says "pleaded." Everybody says "pled" — and not just the good folks on Law & Order. "Pled" just sounds better to the ear.

Twice, legal tabloid/blog Above the Law has asked its readers which they prefer — "pleaded" or "pled."2 Twice, strong majorities chose "pled." Check Westlaw or Lexis, and you'll find that judges use "pled" more often than "pleaded."3

Moreover, it's not like "pled" is the legal-writing equivalent of texting's "OMG" — heck, even Edmund Spenser used "pled" way back in 1596.4 And Michael Quinion, the famous British etymologist and writer who runs the website World Wide Words, describes "pled" as the American strong-verb form of the past tense of "to plead."5

How many briefs and opinions have you read in which the author used "plead" as the past tense of "plead"? Somebody heard "pled" and believed — incorrectly — that "plead" is like "read" (a word that keeps the same spelling in its past-tense form) or "lead" (which is only pronounced "led" when it is Pb on the Periodic Table of Elements). That error will wane when more writers embrace "pled" — "pled" can't be mistaken for the present-tense "plead."

Boone can wield a pen, but on this one, he's stuck in the past. Use "pled."

BOONE'S VIEW

(The majority view — ;or as Chandler calls it, the Garner-groupie view)

Use "pleaded." Chandler slips into hyperbole when he says that "everybody says 'pled.'" That, of course, isn't true. In fact, every legal and journalistic writing guide from the last 100 years has said that "pleaded" is the better choice.6 And for good reason: "Pleaded" better captures the past-tense-ness of the event.7

Don't believe me? Ask the Supremes: A quick Westlaw search reveals that the Supreme Court has used "pleaded" in over 3,000 opinions, "pled" in only 26 — and in some of those 26 opinions, the Court was quoting someone else when it used Chandler's pet word. Or ask rock-star circuit Judges Richard Posner and Frank Easterbrook: With only rare exceptions, they use "pleaded," not "pled."

Mind you, Posner and Easterbrook are the opposite of stuffy writers. They write in a conversational, almost folksy tone — using contractions and colloquialisms to great effect.8 So using "pleaded" is not a matter of being "stuck in the past," as Chandler says. It's a matter of being careful.9

Chandler can turn a phrase, but on this one, he's watched too much TV. Use "pleaded."

Conclusion

So there you have it. We'll leave it to you to decide who has the better of the argument.10

But whatever you do, don't use "plead" as the past tense of "plead."11 That's just wrong.

::::FOOTNOTES::::

1. Garner's Dictionary of Legal Usage, 682 (third edition, 2011).

2. http://abovethelaw.com/2011/12/grammer-pole-of-the-weak-pleaded-v-pled/.

3. Eugene Volokh also has run the Westlaw and Lexis numbers and has confirmed that "pled" gets more hits: http://www.volokh.com/2010/11/12/horace-and-westlaw/.

4. See Evan Jenkins, "Pleaded Guilty: A Modest Plea," in Columbia Journalism Review, at http://www.cjr.org/resources/lc/pleadguilty.php.

5. See World Wide Words Newsletter, Saturday 11 April 2009.

6. See, e.g., Garner's Modern American Usage 682 (third edition, 2011) (favoring "pleaded" and collecting a number of sources that do the same); The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage 263 (first revised edition); The Associated Press Stylebook, 215 (2011).

7. Above the Law's David Lat has made the same point: http://abovethelaw.com/2008/01/a-random-friday-poll-pleaded-or-pled/.

8. For a great discussion of Posner's and Easterbrook's writing, check out Brian J. Paul's "Toward a More Impure Writing Style: The Opinions of Judge Posner and Chief Judge Easterbrook and What the Bar Can Learn From Them." It's available at http://www.icemiller.com/pdf/judge_posner_and_chief_judge_easterbrook_and_what_the_bar can_learn from_them .pdf.

9. "Careful speakers use pleaded." Frank H. Vizetelly, A Deskbook of Errors in English, 167 (1906) (quoted in Garner's Modern American Usage at 682).

10. Readers may register their view on the Daily Report's Web poll at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ZF22FCD .

11. We can provide examples of offending opinions and briefs upon request.

Brian Boone is a senior litigation associate at Alston & Bird . Brian is a Republican. Both love crack writing. John Chandler is a senior litigation partner at King & Spalding and a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers.



Subscribe to Daily Report

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • John Fenner

    January 16, 2013 07:30 AM

    No question--"pleaded" has three more letters. In my practice, where the Judge often only has enough time to read your Motion's first page, that is crucial.

    Now, if we can get corporate/real estate lawyers to lose "In the event that", "including, without limitation" & "may, but shall not be required to", we will save a lot of trees. (I define/translate those terms in my Definitions section, and no one complains.)

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Bar Can Learn
  • ZF22FCD
  • Supremes
  • Modern American Usage 682
  • New York Times Manual
  • Associated Press Stylebook
  • Supreme Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Redacted Emails Ordered Released in Aaron Swartz Case
    •      
  2. Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft
    •      
  3. Law Technology News Goin' Mobile With ALM
    •      
  4. Lexis for Microsoft Office Now Works With Lexis Advance
    •      
  5. Cross This App Off Your To-Do List
    •      
  6. Product of the Week: Adobe LeanPrint
    •      
  7. Judge Opens Toyota's Secrets to Additional Attorneys
    •      
  8. FTC Warns Companies of Children's Privacy Violations
    •      
  9. EDRM Remains Vital to E-Discovery
    •      
  10. CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact LTN
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Magazine
  • RSS Feeds
  • LTN Awards
  • Bookstore
  • Site Map
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media