LTN Law Technology News
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Commentary
  • Surveys
  • Events
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • About LTN
  • Register
  • Topics:
  • E-Discovery & Compliance
  • Litigation Support
  • Practice Management
  • Office Tech
  • Mobile Lawyer
  • Research & Libraries
  • Tech Law

Home > 10 Tips for LegalTech Vendors

Font Size: increase font decrease font

10 Tips for LegalTech Vendors

Adam Losey attends his first LegalTech New York, and has plenty of advice for exhibitors.

By Adam Losey Contact All Articles 

Law Technology News

February 13, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (3)
 
Adam Losey, associate at Foley & Lardner

Adam Losey, associate at Foley & Lardner
Image: Adam Losey

After attending my first LegalTech New York, here are 10 tips for vendors who are trying to reach the next wave of electronic data discovery lawyers and litigation professionals.

1. Hand over the mouse. If you get time in front of potential clients to demonstrate a product, give them the mouse. Let attendees try your tools, with you serving as their guide. Take a trick from teachers — active, engaged learning, is much more effective than a lecture or a slideshow. Do a Socratic-style demonstration: ask questions of the folks reviewing your product throughout the demonstration. When you talk about your product, be specific, and skip the general puffery about how it is the best-in-class, is the most defensible, etc. If I hear 30 minutes of general statements, I learn nothing about your product.

Because you have a financial interest in selling me your product, general statements do not carry much weight in my cost-benefit analysis. Plus, if all I hear are generalities, I am going to assume you do not really understand what you are trying to sell. Sales 101 in any industry is to know your product backward and forward. Someone who knows the product will typically be more teacher than salesperson.

2. Add value. Our clients expect more from us than just delivering high-quality work product and hyper-responsive client service. They demand that we add value in fresh ways. From partnering with them in pro bono endeavors, to visiting in-house (and off-the-clock) to learn more about how they do business, we are expected to be our client's advocates in and out of the courtroom.

I make a point to try to stay in hotels that are owned by companies we represent, and I even make some personal consumer purchasing decisions based on the fact that I want our clients' businesses to thrive. Our clients know we are in their corner on every level. Develop relationships beyond that of another fungible vendor.

3. Be humble and keep innovating. The barriers to enter the e-discovery world are fairly low. Technology is evolving rapidly, just like the law. The environment is competitive. You cannot rest on your laurels and stop innovating, even if you have a strong market share. Arrogance is a telltale sign of complacency — stifle it, even if you are the best in class. Ask us for advice, and let us know where you are improving.

4. Don't bad-mouth the competition. There is no need to put down your competitors. I would never criticize another law firm while pitching to a potential client — it's gauche. To use the grade-school saying, you shouldn't need to blow out another vendor's candle to make yours shine brighter.

5. Share. We practitioners in the e-discovery community need talk to each other and trade notes, so we get candid feedback from peers about vendors. A fellow practitioner's assessment of the best and worst of show is typically credible. Your opinion on how much better you are than your competitors is not credible, because you have a vested financial interest in saying that everyone else's product is inferior. So stay positive. Show me why you are the best, not why everyone else is the worst.

6. Stop pushing unnecessary services. On the collection front, we know you make a great deal of money in per-gigabyte processing, as well as in making forensic images and selling goods and services associated with data collection. Don't let the profit-motive blind you into trying to steer clients into making tons of forensic images, and processing unnecessary terabytes of data when pre-processing culling methods make sense. The second a vendor tries to push me towards over-the-top collection strategies, they lose my trust, and my business. Lay out the pricing and options. Don't try to push one way or the other in what needs to be collected from a legal standpoint — that is for the lawyers to figure out. You may get away with it with lawyers who don't understand e-discovery and just follow your recommendations blindly, but the bar is learning fast. Be make sure your profit-motive doesn't cloud your judgment. You can make plenty of money performing the services without overselling.

7. Leave the legal work to the lawyers. Do not cross the line into providing legal services. Advising a client on what is a legally sufficient preservation effort, and giving advice on litigation strategy, is a task for a lawyer. There is a knowledge gap in the bar-at-large in the EDD world, and plenty of lawyers are more than happy to defer entirely to non-lawyer judgments on legal issues involving e-discovery. Don't fall into the trap of filling the vacuum for them — offer your products or services, and let clients know you cannot make legal calls for them on legal issues. This is tough to do, because many clients will not like to hear this — but you play with fire when you have non-lawyers skirting the edges of practicing law.

8. Reach out to new lawyers. Nearly every law student knows LexisNexis or Westlaw by the time they get out of law school, and are intimately familiar with both titans of legal research. When these students matriculate into practice, they have a strong preference (typically) for their favorite brand of legal research. But few law graduates have any knowledge of e-discovery vendors. Guess who handles EDD at most firms? New lawyers. Start reaching out to law students, so that when they see hundreds of booths at LegalTech, they'll hit yours before conking out from "vendor fatigue."

9. Let me export a privilege log with a click. For review-platform vendors: Once a review is completed, I don't want to spend a fortune re-reviewing the same documents to compile a privilege log. Nor should I, if your review platform has the features and fields I need. Reviewers need to be able to enter the fields necessary for a legally sufficient privilege log, and then be able to export those fields for all the documents tagged as privileged with the click of a button — into a format that we can produce (such as an Excel spreadsheet). This should be an easy feature to integrate into your product, yet I am surprised I don't see a touted "One-Click Privilege Log" feature on all review tools.

10. Let me kick the tires on a case for free. Ask me to use your product for free on a case. The tools we use in a litigation are a client decision in the end, but they often listen to our recommendations. And if we can try out your technology for free, that helps make up for the loss we incur as we take non-billable time to learn your new tool. Our clients really love when we can get them something for free that other firms need to pay for — and when our clients are happy, we are happy. If we like your product, we will pay for it in the future.

Adam Losey is an associate with Foley & Lardner. Email: alosey@foley.com.



Subscribe to Law Technology News

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Legal Work for the Lawyers Response

    February 14, 2013 11:11 AM

    Thanks for the comment MLSandler! A quick rebuttal and clarification on the point: I completely agree with your sentiment that lawyers make excellent vendor representatives, especially ones that have been in the trenches.



    A law degree, in itself, does nothing to make someone qualified to handle eDiscovery issues. However, being admitted to the bar does give you the right to practice law. Lawyers have a monopoly on the practice of law, some disagree that this is wise (see http://www.brookings.edu/research/books/2011/firstthingwedoletsderegulateallthelawyers) but it is the case in this country.



    My point goes more toward non-lawyers getting close (or crossing the line) from providing technicial service into practicing law by making legal judgments as to what is an adequate collection, a defensible search, and the like.



    Where it gets really murky is when you have a non-lawyer vendor representative making legal reccomendations as to how to conduct a litigation-- but it is hard to tell where exactly the line exists between giving technical advice and giving legal advice.



    Also check out the D.C. bar ethics opinion that covers some of this at http://www.dcbar.org/for_lawyers/ethics/legal_ethics/opinions/opinion362.cfm.

  • Ralph

    February 14, 2013 10:49 AM

    Is he insightful, or what?!

  • MLSandler

    February 14, 2013 09:33 AM

    Adam has hit the mark on almost every point he makes here. The one I disagree with? #7. What Adam fails to recognize is the HUGE number of licensed attorneys out in the world who are NOT practicing law. many of them stay near the vertical by becoming CIO's, Directors of Information Services, Directors of Litigation Services and even, dare I say it - Vendor Representatives. Who BEST to sell a product but someone who has used it in the past and CAN in fact give new clients quite accurate recommendations on use, storage etc. Don't poo poo someone's comments simply because you aSSume they don't have what you deem to be "valid credentials". We all know what happens next.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Key categories

    
  • E-discovery
  • Networking, Storage, Content
  • Research and Libraries

Most viewed stories

    
  1. 10 Devices You Should Never Take Along on a Business Trip
    •      
  2. Is Stanford Law the New Vortex of Legal Technology?
    •      
  3. Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft
    •      
  4. Redacted Emails Ordered Released in Aaron Swartz Case
    •      
  5. Big Law Whipped for Poor Tech Training
    •      
  6. CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation
    •      
  7. Law Technology News Goin' Mobile With ALM
    •      
  8. FTC Warns Companies of Children's Privacy Violations
    •      
  9. Judge Opens Toyota's Secrets to Additional Attorneys
    •      
  10. Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

The General Counsel and the Compensation Committee

Your Company's Been Hacked -- What Comes Next?

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Voids $3 Million Judgment Against Girls Gone Wild Producer

Judge Says Boston Bombings Had No Effect on Terrorist Sentences
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge Declines to Block Act-of-War Defense in 9/11 Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Artist Doesn't Have to Pay Fine for Poaching From Trash
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation to Proceed

Ex-Quarterback Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Anadarko Entities
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Insurer Beats Bid By Bilked Client
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Barnes Asks For Court-Appointed Lawyer To Help Defend Brooks

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact LTN
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Magazine
  • RSS Feeds
  • LTN Awards
  • Bookstore
  • Site Map
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media