LTN Law Technology News
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Commentary
  • Surveys
  • Events
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • About LTN
  • Register
  • Topics:
  • E-Discovery & Compliance
  • Litigation Support
  • Practice Management
  • Office Tech
  • Mobile Lawyer
  • Research & Libraries
  • Tech Law

Home > FTC Sues to Prevent Merger of Computer Circuit Makers

Font Size: increase font decrease font

FTC Sues to Prevent Merger of Computer Circuit Makers

By Mike Scarcella All Articles 

Legal Times

December 20, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Computer board


image: Clipart.com

The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit to block the $330 million merger of integrated computer circuit makers Integrated Device Technology Inc. and PLX Technology Inc., alleging that the deal would give the combined company a near-monopoly.

In an administrative complaint filed Tuesday, the FTC said that the deal would result in higher prices, reduced innovation and lower quality in the $100 million worldwide market for a type of integrated computer circuits called PCIe switches. The switches perform critical connectivity functions in computers and other electronic devices.

PLX, based in Sunnyvale, Calif., is the number one maker of PCIe switches, while Integrated Device Technology, or IDT, which is headquartered in San Jose, Calif., is number two. Both companies are publicly traded. According to the FTC, the merger would give the new company a combined market share of more than 85 percent.

In touting the deal, IDT president Ted Tweksbury in a press release issued in late April cited the companies' "complementary product sets, technologies and customer bases."

IDT is represented by Latham & Watkins partner Joshua Holian, who did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment. PLX is represented by Baker & McKenzie partners Katherine Funk and Brian Burke, who declined comment.

"The combination of IDT and PLX would hurt competition and lead to higher switch prices, lower innovation in the marketplace, and reduced customer service," said Richard Feinstein, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, in a news release.

An evidentiary hearing is scheduled before an administrative law judge at the FTC beginning on May 20, 2013. However, the FTC also said it was prepared to seek a preliminary injunction in federal district court if necessary to stop the deal from closing pending the hearing.

According to the FTC, "Competition between the two firms has led them to offer lower prices, more innovative features, and better customer service" — competition that would be lost by the merger.

The commissioners voted 4 to 0 to bring the complaint, with Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen recused.

First reported in The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.



Subscribe to Legal Times

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Latham & Watkins

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Integrated Device Technology Inc.
  • Legal Times
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • PLX Technology Inc.

Key categories

    
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Redacted Emails Ordered Released in Aaron Swartz Case
    •      
  2. Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft
    •      
  3. Law Technology News Goin' Mobile With ALM
    •      
  4. Lexis for Microsoft Office Now Works With Lexis Advance
    •      
  5. Product of the Week: Adobe LeanPrint
    •      
  6. Cross This App Off Your To-Do List
    •      
  7. Judge Opens Toyota's Secrets to Additional Attorneys
    •      
  8. EDRM Remains Vital to E-Discovery
    •      
  9. FTC Warns Companies of Children's Privacy Violations
    •      
  10. The Duty to Preserve: 'VOOM' One Year Later
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact LTN
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Magazine
  • RSS Feeds
  • LTN Awards
  • Bookstore
  • Site Map
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media