LTN Law Technology News
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Commentary
  • Surveys
  • Events
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • About LTN
  • Register
  • Topics:
  • E-Discovery & Compliance
  • Litigation Support
  • Practice Management
  • Office Tech
  • Mobile Lawyer
  • Research & Libraries
  • Tech Law

Home > FTC Sues to Prevent Merger of Computer Circuit Makers

Font Size: increase font decrease font

FTC Sues to Prevent Merger of Computer Circuit Makers

By Mike Scarcella All Articles 

Legal Times

December 20, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Computer board


image: Clipart.com

The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit to block the $330 million merger of integrated computer circuit makers Integrated Device Technology Inc. and PLX Technology Inc., alleging that the deal would give the combined company a near-monopoly.

In an administrative complaint filed Tuesday, the FTC said that the deal would result in higher prices, reduced innovation and lower quality in the $100 million worldwide market for a type of integrated computer circuits called PCIe switches. The switches perform critical connectivity functions in computers and other electronic devices.

PLX, based in Sunnyvale, Calif., is the number one maker of PCIe switches, while Integrated Device Technology, or IDT, which is headquartered in San Jose, Calif., is number two. Both companies are publicly traded. According to the FTC, the merger would give the new company a combined market share of more than 85 percent.

In touting the deal, IDT president Ted Tweksbury in a press release issued in late April cited the companies' "complementary product sets, technologies and customer bases."

IDT is represented by Latham & Watkins partner Joshua Holian, who did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment. PLX is represented by Baker & McKenzie partners Katherine Funk and Brian Burke, who declined comment.

"The combination of IDT and PLX would hurt competition and lead to higher switch prices, lower innovation in the marketplace, and reduced customer service," said Richard Feinstein, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, in a news release.

An evidentiary hearing is scheduled before an administrative law judge at the FTC beginning on May 20, 2013. However, the FTC also said it was prepared to seek a preliminary injunction in federal district court if necessary to stop the deal from closing pending the hearing.

According to the FTC, "Competition between the two firms has led them to offer lower prices, more innovative features, and better customer service" — competition that would be lost by the merger.

The commissioners voted 4 to 0 to bring the complaint, with Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen recused.

First reported in The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.



Subscribe to Legal Times

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Latham & Watkins

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Integrated Device Technology Inc.
  • Legal Times
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • PLX Technology Inc.

Key categories

    
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation

Most viewed stories

    
  1. iPad Competition Heats Up
    •      
  2. Gartner Announces E-Discovery Leaders in 'Magic Quadrant'
    •      
  3. 9 Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story
    •      
  4. YesLaw Integrates With LexisNexis CaseMap and TextMap
    •      
  5. Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting
    •      
  6. Corporate Cyberattacks Come Out of the Shadows
    •      
  7. Microsoft Office on iPhone, More Tech Briefs
    •      
  8. 12-on-12 What to Read When the Heat Arrives
    •      
  9. Lawyer in High Court Gene Patent Case Grabs Headlines
    •      
  10. Jailbreak Your Smartphone but Not Your Tablet
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About LTN   |
  • Contact LTN   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media