LTN Law Technology News
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Commentary
  • Surveys
  • Events
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • About LTN
  • Register
  • Topics:
  • E-Discovery & Compliance
  • Litigation Support
  • Practice Management
  • Office Tech
  • Mobile Lawyer
  • Research & Libraries
  • Tech Law

Home > FTC Sues to Prevent Merger of Computer Circuit Makers

Font Size: increase font decrease font

FTC Sues to Prevent Merger of Computer Circuit Makers

By Mike Scarcella All Articles 

Legal Times

December 20, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Computer board


image: Clipart.com

The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit to block the $330 million merger of integrated computer circuit makers Integrated Device Technology Inc. and PLX Technology Inc., alleging that the deal would give the combined company a near-monopoly.

In an administrative complaint filed Tuesday, the FTC said that the deal would result in higher prices, reduced innovation and lower quality in the $100 million worldwide market for a type of integrated computer circuits called PCIe switches. The switches perform critical connectivity functions in computers and other electronic devices.

PLX, based in Sunnyvale, Calif., is the number one maker of PCIe switches, while Integrated Device Technology, or IDT, which is headquartered in San Jose, Calif., is number two. Both companies are publicly traded. According to the FTC, the merger would give the new company a combined market share of more than 85 percent.

In touting the deal, IDT president Ted Tweksbury in a press release issued in late April cited the companies' "complementary product sets, technologies and customer bases."

IDT is represented by Latham & Watkins partner Joshua Holian, who did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment. PLX is represented by Baker & McKenzie partners Katherine Funk and Brian Burke, who declined comment.

"The combination of IDT and PLX would hurt competition and lead to higher switch prices, lower innovation in the marketplace, and reduced customer service," said Richard Feinstein, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, in a news release.

An evidentiary hearing is scheduled before an administrative law judge at the FTC beginning on May 20, 2013. However, the FTC also said it was prepared to seek a preliminary injunction in federal district court if necessary to stop the deal from closing pending the hearing.

According to the FTC, "Competition between the two firms has led them to offer lower prices, more innovative features, and better customer service" — competition that would be lost by the merger.

The commissioners voted 4 to 0 to bring the complaint, with Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen recused.

First reported in The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.



Subscribe to Legal Times

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Baker & McKenzie
  • Latham & Watkins

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Integrated Device Technology Inc.
  • Legal Times
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • PLX Technology Inc.

Key categories

    
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Big Law Whipped for Poor Tech Training
    •      
  2. 10 Devices You Should Never Take Along on a Business Trip
    •      
  3. Is Stanford Law the New Vortex of Legal Technology?
    •      
  4. Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft
    •      
  5. How the Predictive Coding Process Will Affect Paralegals
    •      
  6. Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks
    •      
  7. ILTA Study to Gauge New Technologies' Impact on Law Practice
    •      
  8. Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again
    •      
  9. CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation
    •      
  10. Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About LTN   |
  • Contact LTN   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media