LTN Law Technology News
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Commentary
  • Surveys
  • Events
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • About LTN
  • Register
  • Topics:
  • E-Discovery & Compliance
  • Litigation Support
  • Practice Management
  • Office Tech
  • Mobile Lawyer
  • Research & Libraries
  • Tech Law

Home > South Korean Court Rules Samsung Didn't Copy iPhone

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next

South Korean Court Rules Samsung Didn't Copy iPhone

August 24, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Court spokesman Kim Mun-sung said the court's ruling was to take effect immediately, although companies often request that sanctions be suspended while they evaluate their legal options.

Nam Ki-yung, a spokesman for Samsung, said the company welcomed the ruling.

"Today's ruling also affirmed our position that one single company cannot monopolize generic design features," he said.

Apple did not respond to multiple calls seeking comment.

The court also ordered each company to pay monetary compensation to its competitor. Samsung must pay Apple 25 million won ($22,000) while Apple must pay its rival 40 million won.

South Korea is not a big market for Apple, and the ruling is not likely to have a big impact on jury deliberations in the U.S.

However, some industry watchers expressed concern over the South Korean ruling to protect industry standard patents. They say the decision could invite a trade war by giving Samsung and fellow South Korean company LG -- both industry standard patent holders -- more room to block rivals' entrance into South Korea if they don't agree to licensing terms.

"It would mean that foreign companies would either have to bow to Samsung's and LG's demands ... or stop selling in Korea," said Florian Mueller, a patent expert in Munich, Germany who has been closely following the case.

Courts in Europe, including Netherlands, France, Italy and Germany have rejected similar claims by Samsung that Apple violated its wireless patents, with judges arguing that the patents have become part of industry standards. Standard-essential patents are a crucial technology for new players to make products compatible with the rest of the market and must be licensed under fair and reasonable terms.

Europe's anti-trust regulator launched an investigation earlier this year into whether Samsung was failing to license those patents under fair and reasonable terms.

Continue reading

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • IDC
  • Apple 25
  • Associated Press
  • Samsung Inc.
  • Ogilvy
  • Seoul Central District Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. 10 Devices You Should Never Take Along on a Business Trip
    •      
  2. Is Stanford Law the New Vortex of Legal Technology?
    •      
  3. Redacted Emails Ordered Released in Aaron Swartz Case
    •      
  4. Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft
    •      
  5. CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation
    •      
  6. Law Technology News Goin' Mobile With ALM
    •      
  7. FTC Warns Companies of Children's Privacy Violations
    •      
  8. Judge Opens Toyota's Secrets to Additional Attorneys
    •      
  9. How the Predictive Coding Process Will Affect Paralegals
    •      
  10. Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

The General Counsel and the Compensation Committee

Your Company's Been Hacked -- What Comes Next?

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

South Florida Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Suit Names Missing Attorney Timothy McCabe For Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge Declines to Block Act-of-War Defense in 9/11 Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Panel Finds 'Excessive' City Fine for Poaching Antenna From Trash
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive

Ex-College QB Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Brooks Looks To Political Ally For Criminal Defense

Attorney Fee Hearing in Waffle House Sex Case Heats Up
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • Contact LTN
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Magazine
  • RSS Feeds
  • LTN Awards
  • Bookstore
  • Site Map
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media