LTN Law Technology News
  • This Site
  • Law.com Network
  • Legal Web
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Commentary
  • Surveys
  • Events
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • About LTN
  • Register
  • Topics:
  • E-Discovery & Compliance
  • Litigation Support
  • Practice Management
  • Office Tech
  • Mobile Lawyer
  • Research & Libraries
  • Tech Law

Home > Security Risks of Online Review

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Security Risks of Online Review

Albert BarsocchiniAll Articles

Law Technology News

September 22, 2011

facebook
Tweet
  • Print
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Post a Comment

Image: Clipart.com

Data breaches are on the rise, with more than 300 identified breaches this year, according to the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. The breaches are evenly split between hackers and malware, experts say; 90 percent are targeted at databases that may contain caches of valuable data, reports USA Today's Technology Live. The good news: Most breaches could have been avoided with good security practices.

But these breaches raise issues for electronic data discovery, particularly for practitioners who use web-based ("cloud") review services. Care must be taken when evaluating and choosing vendors to be sure data is protected throughout the EDD process. When sensitive intellectual property leaves the firewall of an organization, corporate legal has both an ethical and legal obligation to zealously protect client confidences and secrets. This can be a daunting task -- security risk points include the cloud storage server, review workstations, the pipeline between the review workstation, and the servers -- and access control and security credentials of employees and reviewers.

For starters, thoroughly review the security protocols that are used to determine access rights and the credentials of all personnel who will be exposed to sensitive data. Many recent security incidences involved use of weak or stolen credentials or passwords, so require that systems have limited logon attempts, and that they hide access credentials. Consider also requiring two-factor authentication.

Documents stored on a server should always be encrypted, and protected by layers of both perimeter and "end-point" security. Discuss with the vendor what will happen to the electronically stored information once the case is over and how it will be deleted from the server. Undetected malware is the most common way to extract information from servers, and it can lay dormant for months, or even years. Absent contractual restrictions, once you load ESI onto a third party's server you essentially lose the ability to monitor who has access to the data. Risks increase when your data is processed outside the United States.

Workstations used for document review are often one of the most vulnerable components of the EDD process -- and can be easy pickings for hackers. Workstations should be continually inspected and certified "clean" of security vulnerabilities such as key logging devices. Require vendors to document what software is loaded on each workstation. The more software, the higher the risk.

It's also crucial to document what devices can be used for review. For example, if an attorney or other professional uses his or her own computer to access review software, that device can be at high risk because it has probably not been inspected and certified "clean." This is especially important when using cloud-based review programs.

Another risk scenario might be called "man in the middle attack" in which the attacker makes independent connections with the server and the workstation and intercepts transmitted data between them. When ESI is being reviewed remotely, the potential for data becoming compromised during transmission increases. These are just two examples of why it's crucial to use proper encryption, such as SSL (Secure Sockets Layer).

Most data breaches today are not sophisticated. They are usually targeted and focused using social engineering or a variety of hacking tools easily found on the internet. Nonetheless, companies should always assume worst-case scenario and then "work backwards" when evaluating data security. Cybersecurity standards such as those promulgated by the Federal Information Security Management Act and the National Institute of Standards and Technology should be used as models when evaluating vendors.

Here are issues to discuss with the potential vendor (and to address in contracts).

• How will the information be secured?
• When were the security protocols last audited?
• Is the ESI a high-valued target that requires additional security?
• Ask for details about vulnerability management, security testing, and intrusion protection protocols
• How is the review workstation secured and how often is it audited?

Always involve a security expert when dealing with highly sensitive information to make sure the ESI will be handled correctly from collection through production.

Unfortunately, most breaches are either never discovered or discovered long after the damage has been done. The best advice: Assume that if the information is of high enough value to hackers, they almost always will find a way to get it!

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Verizon Breach Report -- published annually.

IBM x-force Report -- published quarterly.

Mitre/SANS top 25 Most Dangerous Software Errors -- published annually.

Stephen M. Kramarsky, a member of Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky, focuses on complex intellectual property litigation.



Subscribe to Law Technology News

You must be signed in to comment an article

Advertisement

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
  • USA Today
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • Verizon
  • IBM

Key categories

    
  • E-discovery
  • Information Security
  • Networking, Storage, Content

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Mock Trial at RSA Conference: Trust, but Verify Authenticated Users
    •      
  2. Bring Your Own Device to the Law Firm
    •      
  3. N.Y. Panel Adopts 'Zubulake' on Bearing Costs in Discovery
    •      
  4. Guidance Addresses Usability, Adds Mobile Support in EnCase Enterprise 7
    •      
  5. Is the First Amendment in Digital Decline?
    •      
  6. Will Software Liability Make Software Secure?
    •      
  7. Trademark Board Just Says No to 'CrackBerry'
    •      
  8. Latest Digital Technology Abets Age-Old Crimes
    •      
  9. 5 Essential Elements of a Global Compliance Program
    •      
  10. Research Suggests Technology Distracts 2Ls Most During Lectures
    •      

Advertisement

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

Advertisement

From the Law.com Network

International Trade Commission Sees Record Patent Claims in 2011

Tell Us How You Really Feel, Leo

The Next Silicon Valley?

Federal Judge Files Complaint Over His Own Email About Obama

Monsanto Wins Over Pioneer as First to Invent Genetically Modified Corn Type

Guidance Addresses Usability, Adds Mobile Support in EnCase Enterprise 7

Syngence Hires a CTO and a VP of Product Development

Sexual Orientation Question Not a Hit With Calif. Judges

Brown Gives State Public Defender a Third Term
  •      
    • Subscription Required

1st DCA reverses $41 million punitive award to smoker's family
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Attorney's family foundation funds brain injury research
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Christie Proposes Making Drug Court Mandatory for Selected Offenders

N.J. Supreme Court Weighs Wife's Rights in Surrogacy Child Not Genetically Hers
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The 2011 Electronic AmLaw 200
These reports have become the industry standard for determining benchmarks for success within law firms.

U.S. Court Cancels Weakened Pact in Asbestos Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Judge Finds Private Right to Sue Under State's Prompt Pay Law

Drivers' Collective Action Can Proceed Against Bimbo Bakeries

Former Pa. Judge Charged by Conduct Board Over Alleged Lewd Photos
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Supreme Secrets

Injured Recreational Basketball Player Nets $4.4M

Men on Paternity Leave Are Slackers at Home

Maybe It's Not Just Dinner, After All

Fraud Suit Filed Over Fish & Richardson's Alleged Failure to Disclose Relationship With Arbitrator

Fort Worth 411: Firm Alleges Number-Napping Left Clients Incommunicado

Prosecutors are denied foreclosure fraud tool

'Very profitable year' for Fisher & Phillips

  • Contact LTN
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Magazine
  • RSS Feeds
  • LTN Awards
  • Bookstore
  • Site Map
The Law.com Network
  • ADVERTISE

law.com

  • Newswire
  • Special Reports
  • International News
  • Lists, Surveys & Rankings
  • Legal Blogs
  • Site Map

alm national

  • The American Lawyer
  • The Am Law Litigation Daily
  • Corporate Counsel
  • Law Technology News
  • The National Law Journal

alm regional

  • Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Daily Business Review (FL)
  • Delaware Law Weekly
  • Daily Report (GA)
  • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
  • New Jersey Law Journal
  • New York Law Journal
  • GC New York
  • The Recorder (CA)
  • Texas Lawyer

directories

  • ALM Experts
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • In-House Law Departments at the Top 500 Companies
  • New York's Women Leaders in the Law
  • The National Law Journal Leadership Profiles
  • National Directory of Minority Attorneys

books & newsletters

  • Best-Selling Books
  • Publication E-Alerts
  • Law Journal Newsletters
  • LawCatalog Store
  • Law Journal Press Online

research

  • ALM Legal Intelligence
  • Court Reporters
  • MA 3000
  • Verdict Search
  • ALM Experts
  • Legal Dictionary
  • Smart Litigator

events & conferences

  • ALM Events
  • LegalTech®
  • Virtual LegalTech®
  • Virtual Events
  • Webinars & Online Events
  • Insight Information

reprints

  • Reprints

online cle

  • CLE Center

career

  • Lawjobs
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions
Close [ X ]