Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator (NY)
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • lawjobs.com
  • Special Reports
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
International News
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Font Size: increase font decrease font

First Circuit: Museum Antiquities Can't Be Used to Satisfy Judgment Against Iran

By Sheri Qualters All Articles 

The National Law Journal

March 5, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

A federal appeals court has ruled that plaintiffs injured in a 1997 Hamas terrorist attack in Jerusalem can't attach Iranian antiquities at Boston-area museums to fulfill a judgment award against the Republic of Iran.

On February 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a ruling by George O'Toole Jr. of the District of Massachusetts dissolving attachments of the property.

Jenny Rubin and other plaintiffs sought to attach Iranian antiquities from Boston's Museum of Fine Arts and several Harvard University museums.

The First Circuit held that the antiquities are not "blocked assets" -- assets seized or frozen by the United States as part of a trade sanction, under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002. The court also held that because Iran never claimed to own the museum pieces, they couldn't be "contested" and ultimately attached under Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations.

The case stemmed from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which found "clear and convincing evidence" in a 2003 ruling that Iran and other defendants gave terrorist training and other assistance to the Hamas terrorists behind the bombing.

Iran has not honored that judgment, so the judgment creditors filed a motion for attachment by trustee process in federal court in Massachusetts.

In September 2011, O'Toole held that the plaintiffs did not prove that any item at the museums was property of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He also held that Iranian law does not "vest ownership of the antiquities at issue with the government of Iran."

Senio r Judge Norman Stahl wrote the opinion in Rubin v. Harvard University, joined by Judge Jeffrey Howard and Senior Judge Kermit Lipez.

Stahl wrote that the First Circuit deferred to the Office of Foreign Assets Control's "reasonable position" that an asset can be contested "only if Iran itself has claimed an interest in the asset."

"Iran has never made such a claim with regard to the antiquities in the Museums' possession," Stahl wrote.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

  • LEGAL UPDATES
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS E-ALERT
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Covington & Burling
  • Looney & Grossman
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • First Circuit
  • Terrorism Risk Insurance
  • Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control
  • Museum of Fine Arts
  • Hamas
  • US District Court
  • Harvard University
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Harvard Law Opens Applications to Juniors
    •      
  4. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  5. Law for Laymen
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

EEOC Gets Tough With Companies on Genetic Privacy

Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities

Amid Spy Scandal, Russia Boots Baker & McKenzie Lawyer

Survey: Firm Leaders Admit Downturn's Permanent Impact

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court System, Counties Agree on 3 Court Facility Upgrades

Guardian Who Delayed Final Account Must Pay Referee Fee
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out

McVay Wins Superior Court Nod With Western Turnout
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Anadarko Entities
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Filing Blunder To Cost $142,600
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media