Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator (NY)
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • lawjobs.com
  • Special Reports
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
International News
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Austrian M&A: New Disclosure Requirements To Prevent Secret Stakebuilding In Austrian Listed Companies

By Christian Herbst, Dr., LL.M. (Harvard)
Schönherr Rechtsanwälte GmbH 
All Articles 

 

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

  • As of 1 January 2013 Austria will tighten disclosure requirements for significant shareholdings in listed companies.
  • The new rules are aimed at preventing secret stake-building in listed companies and target in particular stake-building by cash settled option arrangements and similar financial instruments.
  • The disclosure threshold remains unchanged at 5% and multiples of 5%, but an additional disclosure threshold at 4% will apply and listed companies may lower that threshold in their articles of association to 3%.
  • By 28 February 2013 those reaching or exceeding the new thresholds, including by financial instruments must notify the Financial Market Authority, the Vienna Stock Exchange and the Issuer.
  • Sanctions for violations, in addition to administrative fines, newly include a temporary suspension of voting rights as to the non-disclosed shares until 6 months after proper disclosure, yet no suspension of dividend rights.

2012 AMENDMENT TO STOCK EXCHANGE ACT CLOSES CURRENT LOOPHOLE INDISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDINGS
The 2012 amendment of the Austrian Stock Exchange Act (BörseG) under BGBl I 83 /2012 will take effect as of 1 January 2013. The amendment aims at capturing financial instruments not granting an enforceable right to acquire shares, in particular cash settled equity swaps. These instruments currently fall outside the existing disclosure requirements. The new legislation is a regulatory response to the recent secret stake-building of a 20% plus stake by an investor in listed Telekom Austria. The technique applied corresponded to that used in the stake-buildings in Sulzer/Oerlikon/Switzerland and Schaeffler/Conti and Porsche/VW in Germany. The new Austrian rules stop short of the 2012 German rules with the Austrian rules inter alia providing for a limited suspension of voting rights but no loss of dividend claims.

CURRENT AUSTRIAN NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
The Austrian Stock Exchange Act provides for 2 (separate) disclosure obligations: (i) an obligation to notify the acquisition or disposal of shares in a company traded on a regulated market; and (ii) an obligation to disclose financial instruments held.

Thresholds: Persons directly or indirectly acquiring or selling shares carrying voting rights of an Austrian listed issuer must inform the Austrian Financial Market Authority, the exchange operating company and the issuer of the share of voting rights held, if their proportion of voting rights reaches, exceeds or falls below 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 75% or 90%.

Financial Instruments: In general, the Austrian Stock Exchange Act(BörseG) extends the disclosure obligations applicable to shareholders to (direct or indirect) holders of certain financial instruments which entitle the holder to acquire existing shares to which voting rights are attached.

Exemptions: The acquisition of financial instruments does, however, only trigger disclosure obligations, if they result in an entitlement to acquire on the holder's own initiative alone under a formal agreement, (already issued) shares to which voting rights are attached. Therefore, until the 2012 amendment prevailing opinion held that cash settled options and swaps didnot qualify as financial instruments triggering disclosure obligations.

Acting in Concert: The notification obligation also applies to persons acting in concert with a person holding shares or relevant financial instruments; a shareholder agreement, a controlling interest or a common parent company may, inter alia, qualify two persons as acting in concert. Therefore, disclosure obligations cannot be circumvented/avoided by building a stake via various acquisition vehicles, if such vehicles are (ultimately) controlled by the same entity.

Financial Institutions: Exceptions inter alia apply to (i) shares acquired for the sole purpose of clearing and settling within the usual short settling cycle (maximum 3 trading days), (ii) custodians, provided such custodians can only exercise the voting rights attached to the relevant shares under instructions given in writing or by electronic means, (iii) market makers, and (iv) investment firms and credit institutions. Please note, however, that the exception applicable to investment firms and credit institutions is limited to shares acquired within the scope of the conduct of the business of securities dealing (as defined under the Austrian Banking Act), provided that, inparticular, the stake held due to securities trading does not exceed 5 %. Thus, an individual financial institution holding more than 5% of the voting rights in a listed company is obliged to disclose such shareholding.

Sanctions: Potential sanctions include (i) an administrative law fine of upto EUR 30,000 ( increased to EUR 150,000 under the 2012 legislation) ; (ii) damage claims by market participants, (iii) suspension of voting rights, if provided for in the issuer's AoA (under the 2012 legislation suspension of voting rights statutorily foreseen), and (iv) suspension of trading.

2012 AMENDMENT OF AUSTRIAN DISCLOSURE RULES BROADEN THE DEFINITIONOF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

  • LEGAL UPDATES
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS E-ALERT
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • CMS Cameron McKenna

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Mauritius
  • BörseG
  • Issuer.Sanctions
  • Volkswagen AG
  • Austrian Financial Market Authority
  • Vienna Stock Exchange
  • Financial Institutions
  • Harvard University
  • Telekom Austria AG

Key categories

    
  • Mergers and Acquisitions

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  2. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  3. Budget Plan Contains Funds to Reassign 26,000 18-B Cases
    •      
  4. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  5. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

3rd Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Texas DA Faces Removal Suits Over DWI, Alleged Misconduct
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media