Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Large Firm
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Technology
    • Washington
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator (NY)
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • lawjobs.com
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Resume
    • The Careerist Blog
    • News & Views
  • LawCatalog Store
    • Books Online
    • Best-Selling Books
    • Books
    • Directories
    • E-Newsletters
    • Magazines
    • Newspapers
    • Newsletters
    • Surveys
    • Research Services
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
International News
 
Article
  • email
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • alert
  • rss

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Austrian M&A: New Disclosure Requirements To Prevent Secret Stakebuilding In Austrian Listed Companies

By Christian Herbst, Dr., LL.M. (Harvard)
Schönherr Rechtsanwälte GmbH 
All Articles 

 

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

  • As of 1 January 2013 Austria will tighten disclosure requirements for significant shareholdings in listed companies.
  • The new rules are aimed at preventing secret stake-building in listed companies and target in particular stake-building by cash settled option arrangements and similar financial instruments.
  • The disclosure threshold remains unchanged at 5% and multiples of 5%, but an additional disclosure threshold at 4% will apply and listed companies may lower that threshold in their articles of association to 3%.
  • By 28 February 2013 those reaching or exceeding the new thresholds, including by financial instruments must notify the Financial Market Authority, the Vienna Stock Exchange and the Issuer.
  • Sanctions for violations, in addition to administrative fines, newly include a temporary suspension of voting rights as to the non-disclosed shares until 6 months after proper disclosure, yet no suspension of dividend rights.

2012 AMENDMENT TO STOCK EXCHANGE ACT CLOSES CURRENT LOOPHOLE INDISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDINGS
The 2012 amendment of the Austrian Stock Exchange Act (BörseG) under BGBl I 83 /2012 will take effect as of 1 January 2013. The amendment aims at capturing financial instruments not granting an enforceable right to acquire shares, in particular cash settled equity swaps. These instruments currently fall outside the existing disclosure requirements. The new legislation is a regulatory response to the recent secret stake-building of a 20% plus stake by an investor in listed Telekom Austria. The technique applied corresponded to that used in the stake-buildings in Sulzer/Oerlikon/Switzerland and Schaeffler/Conti and Porsche/VW in Germany. The new Austrian rules stop short of the 2012 German rules with the Austrian rules inter alia providing for a limited suspension of voting rights but no loss of dividend claims.

CURRENT AUSTRIAN NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
The Austrian Stock Exchange Act provides for 2 (separate) disclosure obligations: (i) an obligation to notify the acquisition or disposal of shares in a company traded on a regulated market; and (ii) an obligation to disclose financial instruments held.

Thresholds: Persons directly or indirectly acquiring or selling shares carrying voting rights of an Austrian listed issuer must inform the Austrian Financial Market Authority, the exchange operating company and the issuer of the share of voting rights held, if their proportion of voting rights reaches, exceeds or falls below 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 75% or 90%.

Financial Instruments: In general, the Austrian Stock Exchange Act(BörseG) extends the disclosure obligations applicable to shareholders to (direct or indirect) holders of certain financial instruments which entitle the holder to acquire existing shares to which voting rights are attached.

Exemptions: The acquisition of financial instruments does, however, only trigger disclosure obligations, if they result in an entitlement to acquire on the holder's own initiative alone under a formal agreement, (already issued) shares to which voting rights are attached. Therefore, until the 2012 amendment prevailing opinion held that cash settled options and swaps didnot qualify as financial instruments triggering disclosure obligations.

Acting in Concert: The notification obligation also applies to persons acting in concert with a person holding shares or relevant financial instruments; a shareholder agreement, a controlling interest or a common parent company may, inter alia, qualify two persons as acting in concert. Therefore, disclosure obligations cannot be circumvented/avoided by building a stake via various acquisition vehicles, if such vehicles are (ultimately) controlled by the same entity.

Financial Institutions: Exceptions inter alia apply to (i) shares acquired for the sole purpose of clearing and settling within the usual short settling cycle (maximum 3 trading days), (ii) custodians, provided such custodians can only exercise the voting rights attached to the relevant shares under instructions given in writing or by electronic means, (iii) market makers, and (iv) investment firms and credit institutions. Please note, however, that the exception applicable to investment firms and credit institutions is limited to shares acquired within the scope of the conduct of the business of securities dealing (as defined under the Austrian Banking Act), provided that, inparticular, the stake held due to securities trading does not exceed 5 %. Thus, an individual financial institution holding more than 5% of the voting rights in a listed company is obliged to disclose such shareholding.

Sanctions: Potential sanctions include (i) an administrative law fine of upto EUR 30,000 ( increased to EUR 150,000 under the 2012 legislation) ; (ii) damage claims by market participants, (iii) suspension of voting rights, if provided for in the issuer's AoA (under the 2012 legislation suspension of voting rights statutorily foreseen), and (iv) suspension of trading.

2012 AMENDMENT OF AUSTRIAN DISCLOSURE RULES BROADEN THE DEFINITIONOF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

  • LEGAL UPDATES
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS E-ALERT
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • CMS Cameron McKenna

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Mauritius
  • BörseG
  • Issuer.Sanctions
  • Volkswagen AG
  • Austrian Financial Market Authority
  • Vienna Stock Exchange
  • Financial Institutions
  • Harvard University
  • Telekom Austria AG

Key categories

    
  • Mergers and Acquisitions

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  2. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  3. Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
    •      
  4. New District Judge Takes Firm Line on Attorney Conduct
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Law.com Network
  • ADVERTISE

law.com

  • Tour the New Site
  • Newswire
  • Special Reports
  • International News
  • Lists, Surveys & Rankings
  • Legal Blogs
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Site Map

alm national

  • The American Lawyer
  • The Am Law Litigation Daily
  • Corporate Counsel
  • Law Technology News
  • The National Law Journal

alm regional

  • Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Daily Business Review (FL)
  • Delaware Law Weekly
  • Daily Report (GA)
  • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
  • New Jersey Law Journal
  • New York Law Journal
  • GC New York
  • The Recorder (CA)
  • Texas Lawyer
  • The Asian Lawyer
  • Focus Europe

directories

  • ALM Experts
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • In-House Law Departments at the Top 500 Companies
  • Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Legal Recruiter's Directory
  • Corporate Counsel Top Rated Lawyers
  • The National Law Journal Leadership Profiles
  • National Directory of Minority Attorneys
  • Go-To Law firms of the Top 500 Companies

books & newsletters

  • Best-Selling Books
  • Publication E-Alerts
  • Law Journal Newsletters
  • LawCatalog Store
  • Law Journal Press Online

research

  • ALM Legal Intelligence
  • Court Reporters
  • MA 3000
  • Verdict Search
  • ALM Experts
  • Legal Dictionary
  • Smart Litigator

events & conferences

  • ALM Events
  • LegalTech®
  • Virtual LegalTech®
  • Virtual Events
  • Webinars & Online Events
  • Insight Information

reprints

  • Reprints

online cle

  • CLE Center

career

  • Lawjobs
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions