Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator (NY)
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • lawjobs.com
  • Special Reports
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
International News
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Font Size: increase font decrease font

The New TCC And Its Effect On Structuring M&A Deals In Turkey

By Ece Guner
Güner Law Office 
All Articles 

 

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

THE NEW TURKISH COMMERCIAL CODE

THE new Turkish Commercial Code (the “new TCC”), which came into effect on 1 July 2012, constitutes an important improvement to and modernization of Turkish company law. This contribution will focus on the more fundamental amendments that are likely to have a significant effect on the process of M&A deal structuring in Turkey.

INCREASED TRANSPARENCY AND NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

First of all, the new TCC brings a major focus on transparency. Until today, non-listed Turkish companies were pretty much utter “closed-boxes”. The new TCC brings a web-site requirement for some companies to reveal certain information on their web-site.

Another helpful improvement brought by the new TCC is the alignment of Turkish accounting standards with the IFRS as of January 2013, and the need for the accounts to be audited. This will make Turkish accounts more “understandable” to international investors. Also, a very strong role is given to audit firms on a broad range of issues throughout the new TCC such as accounts auditing, control/special audits of certain corporate decisions (like capital increases, mergers etc.) and control of intra-group company dealings. All these rules apply without distinction to both public and private companies under the new TCC.

Both the increased transparency and new accounting standards should strongly help the transaction environment.

MERGER TRANSACTIONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The merger process has been defined more clearly and the flexibility of this process has been increased. Further, the possibility of a squeeze-out has been introduced. If it is specifically set out under the merger agreement and 90% of the merging company's shareholders vote as such, it will be possible to squeeze out the minority shareholders (the remaining 10%) by paying the value of their respective shares. Furthermore, the courts’ involvement has been “replaced” by an Auditor Report.

Furthermore, certain simple but important flexibilities are introduced into the ways in which companies were governed and organized until recently. For example, single shareholder companies are now permitted. Similarly, a Board composed of only 1 Board member will also be permitted. Legal entities will also be allowed to be Board members themselves; allowing them to replace their representative with a simple letter to the company, without the need for a general assembly or a Board meeting.

STRUCTURING SHARE OPTIONS

The new TCC explicitly states that it is possible to include put option, call option, tag along and drag along provisions in the Articles of Association (“Articles”) of limited liability companies. The new TCC does not contain any of these provisions for joint stock companies. It furthermore lists the issues that will be included in the Articles of joint stock companies and provides that the Articles will basically not be allowed to deviate from such list. As a result, it will be prudent to assume that it will not be possible to include put/call options, or tag along/drag along rights in the Articles of joint stock companies. It will, however, still be possible to include such provisions in shareholders’ agreements and to secure their compliance through penalty clauses, blank endorsements or escrow mechanisms (albeit there are theoretical debates regarding the validity of the latter two under Turkish Law). Alternatively of course, it will still be possible to establish these rights at the level of a HoldCo/SPV that is set up in a jurisdiction fully recognizing these rights. Such an SPV company would own the Turkish operating company.

It is important to note that for share transfers in joint stock companies, the legislator has taken the approach that the fundamental principle should be “freedom of transfer”. The new TCC requires the Board to demonstrate an “important reason set out in the Articles” of the company to refuse to register/accept a share transfer. Alternatively, the Board may refuse to register a share transfer if it proposes that the company, the majority shareholders or even a third party buys – at their “true value” – the shares that are proposed to be transferred. This should generally reduce the risk of a Board resisting a share transfer and not offering an alternative solution to the minority shareholders wishing to exit the company.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Until recently, it was possible to adopt the registered share capital system only in public companies. The new TCC allows this for private joint stock companies, too. Accordingly, it will be possible to set a registered capital ceiling and the Board will be allowed to increase the share capital up to such ceiling.

Another interesting novelty is the introduction of the “conditional capital increase” concept which basically sets forth the possibility of “equity kickers” and “debt-to-equity swaps”. This should allow some interesting new structuring possibilities.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

  • LEGAL UPDATES
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS E-ALERT
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • CMS Cameron McKenna

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Mauritius
  • MERGER TRANSACTIONS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
  • OpCo
  • PROHIBITION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

Key categories

    
  • Mergers and Acquisitions

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  2. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  3. Lawyers' Pro Bono Hours, Contributions, Will Be Public
    •      
  4. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  5. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media