Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator (NY)
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • lawjobs.com
  • Special Reports
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
International News
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Font Size: increase font decrease font

N.Y. High Court Tosses $900 Million Verdict Against Carlos Slim and America Movil

By Ross Todd All Articles 

The American Lawyer

June 13, 2011

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 


Image: Glowimages

Mayer Brown cured a nearly $1 billion headache for Latin America's largest mobile phone carrier on Tuesday, persuading New York's highest court to throw out $900 million in claims against America Movil brought by shareholders of the company's Ecuadorean unit.

The plaintiffs -- a pair of British Virgin Islands entities called Centro Empresarial Cempresa SA and Conecel Holding Ltd. -- held a combined majority interest in Conecel, Ecuador's mobile telephone company, in the late 1990s. The plaintiffs approached Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim, now America Movil's chair, seeking outside capital for the company. Slim's companies acquired a majority interest in the Ecuadorean company in 2000.

In 2008 the plaintiffs sued America Movil, its subsidiaries, Slim and another director in New York state court, claiming that the defendants supplied them with false financial information regarding the value of their shares as they bought them out early in the last decade. Based on that false information, the plaintiffs claimed, they sold their shares to America Movil and released the defendants from any liabilities in connection with the share sales. The allegations included breach of contract, fraud, fraudulent inducement, unjust enrichment and a claim for accounting.

The New York Court of Appeals unanimously rejected each of those claims Tuesday, affirming a ruling by the state's 1st Appellate Division that the defendants were shielded by a 2003 release agreement with the plaintiffs. Here's the court's 14-page opinion, authored by Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick.

"As sophisticated entities, [the plaintiffs] negotiated and executed an extraordinarily broad release with their eyes wide open," wrote Ciparick. "They cannot now invalidate that release by claiming ignorance of the depth of their fiduciary's misconduct."

Kathleen Kundar of Fox Horan & Camerini, who handled oral arguments for the plaintiffs in April, said the plaintiffs have 30 days to seek a rehearing. Kundar declined to say whether the plaintiffs plan to do so. In a statement to Bloomberg, America Movil said the decision brings the litigation to a close.

Mayer Brown's Donald Falk, who argued for the defendants, told the Am Law Litigation Daily "the chances of rehearing are nonexistent" given the appellate court's unanimous ruling. He led the Mayer Brown team on the case along with partner Steven Selsberg. Selsberg has represented Slim and his companies for more than a decade.

"It's very easy to plead fraud. In almost every bitter contract dispute someone throws out a fraud claim," Falk said. "What this decision says is that, at least for sophisticated parties, you can end a relationship so no one can come back years later and get years of stock appreciation."

This article first appeared on The Am Law Litigation Daily blog on AmericanLawyer.com.



Subscribe to The American Lawyer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

  • LEGAL UPDATES
  • INTERNATIONAL NEWS E-ALERT
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Mayer Brown
  • Mayer Brown

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • America Movil
  • Centro Empresarial Cempresa SA and Conecel Holding
  • New York Court of Appeals
  • Fox Horan & Camerini
  • Bloomberg
  • America Movil
  • Centro Empresarial Cempresa SA and Conecel Holding
  • New York Court of Appeals
  • Fox Horan & Camerini
  • Bloomberg

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  2. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  3. Budget Plan Contains Funds to Reassign 26,000 18-B Cases
    •      
  4. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  5. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

3rd Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Texas DA Faces Removal Suits Over DWI, Alleged Misconduct
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media