Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Large Firm
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Technology
    • Washington
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • lawjobs.com
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Resume
    • The Careerist Blog
    • News & Views
  • LawCatalog Store
    • Books Online
    • Best-Selling Books
    • Books
    • Directories
    • E-Newsletters
    • Magazines
    • Newspapers
    • Newsletters
    • Surveys
    • Research Services
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
  • email
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • alert
  • rss

Law.com Home > Kagan's Credentials Draw Praise, Scorn as Battle Lines Form Over Nomination

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Kagan's Credentials Draw Praise, Scorn as Battle Lines Form Over Nomination

By Tony Mauro All Articles 

The National Law Journal

May 11, 2010

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 
Elena Kagan, solicitor general of the United States

Elena Kagan, solicitor general of the United States
Image: Diego M. Radzinschi/The National Law Journal

Related Items

  • Pressure Grows to Pick a Nonjudge for the High Court

Battle lines formed quickly Monday after President Barack Obama announced that he was nominating Solicitor General Elena Kagan to replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Democrats praised Kagan, the former dean of Harvard Law School, as a highly qualified candidate who deserved quick confirmation, but Republicans questioned her lack of judicial experience and criticized her policies toward military recruiters while at Harvard.

Kagan, 50, would be the youngest member and third woman on the current Court, as well as the first nominee since 1972 who was never a judge. Kagan clerked for Justice Thurgood Marshall and in the early 1990s taught at the University of Chicago Law School, where she first met Obama, then teaching there part-time.

Administration sources indicated Monday that Kagan would continue as solicitor general during the confirmation period, but will not take on any new cases so as to reduce the number of cases she would have to withdraw from if confirmed as a justice. "I doubt she will do any work as solicitor general" during the next few weeks anyway, said Ron Klain, Vice President Joe Biden's chief of staff, said Monday at a press briefing.

The White House is aiming for Senate confirmation hearings by the end of June, with a vote sometime during the summer so she can "get busy," as Obama put it and be ready for the opening of the Court's fall term in October.

"She will be confirmed," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Leahy added that a quick hearing should be possible because the Senate examined her record just 14 months ago when it approved her nomination as solicitor general by a 61-31 vote.

"Her nomination will bring to the Supreme Court a diversity of experience that's been missing since Justice O'Connor retired in 2006," said Leahy, referring to retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's experience as a justice on the Arizona Supreme Court and as a state legislator.

Leahy has been urging presidents for years to look outside the "judicial monastery" for high court nominees, but now that he has gotten his wish Republicans are trying to turn that into a negative.

"Ms. Kagan's lack of judicial experience and short time as solicitor general, arguing just six cases before the Court, is troubling," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee. "The public expects Supreme Court nominees to possess a mastery of the law, a sound judicial philosophy, and a demonstrated dedication to the impartial application of the law and the Constitution."

Kagan's lack of judicial experience will be easy to overcome, said American University Washington College of Law professor Steve Wermiel. Noting that Kagan once clerked for the high court, Wermiel said, "Her learning curve shouldn't be huge. She understands the Court, and is in as good a position to hit the ground running as any nonjudge in the country."

Sessions also said that, even though Kagan won confirmation last year, a "fresh review based on different criteria" is warranted because a life-tenured seat on the Supreme Court is a "far more significant position." That view was echoed by Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., two other members of the judiciary committee.

Conservative groups also signaled they will challenge Kagan because of her policies on military recruiters while dean of Harvard Law School from 2003 to 2009.

Military recruiters were excluded first by the prior dean of Harvard, because the armed forces' "don't ask, don't tell" policy toward gays and lesbians violated the law school's anti-discrimination policy. Kagan continued the policy during her tenure, after the law requiring equal campus access for military recruiters had been struck down. She called the policy on gays in the military "a profound wrong -- a moral injustice of the first order" and joined in a legal challenge to the law requiring campus access by military recruiters. But she ultimately allowed military recruiters so as to not lose federal funding.

Klain said the policy did not keep military lawyers from recruiting Harvard students off-campus -- where most job interviews take place anyway.

It is "ridiculous and absurd," Klain said, to characterize Kagan as anti-military. "Elena respects military service," Klain added, noting that, while she was dean, she held an annual dinner for Harvard Law alumni who are veterans.

But Curt Levey of the conservative Committee for Justice said Monday in a statement: "Millions of Americans will be outraged when they learn that Obama has picked a Supreme Court nominee with a demonstrated hostility to the very armed forces that make our freedom and constitutional rights possible. But that's just one reason why President Obama is in for a more difficult confirmation fight than he bargained for when he chose Kagan."

While adding to the high court's diversity as another woman and as a nonjudge, Kagan scores lower on other kinds of diversity. She'd be the fifth Harvard Law School grad on the Court (along with John Roberts Jr., Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer -- and Ginsburg attended Harvard, too, though she graduated from Columbia Law School.) She would be the fourth justice raised in New York City (with Scalia, Ginsburg and Sotomayor.) Staten Island would be the only New York City borough not represented on the high court.

She is also the third new justice in a row with an undergraduate degree from Princeton University -- following Alito and Sotomayor. And if Kagan is confirmed, the Court would have no Protestant members for the first time in history; she is Jewish, as are Breyer and Ginsburg. The other six justices are Catholics.

Speaking briefly after the president's announcement, Kagan called herself "honored and humbled" by the nomination. She said she felt "blessed" throughout her life to have represented the nation as solicitor general and to have clerked for Marshall and appeals judge Abner Mikva.

She said her job representing the United States as solicitor general is "the most thrilling and the most humbling task a lawyer can perform." Kagan praised the lawyers on her staff as examples of "professionalism, public service and integrity. And I am grateful for all that they have taught me."

She concluded, "Through most of my professional life, I've had the joy of teaching of trying to communicate to students why I love the law so much ... . Law matters: It keeps us safe ... it protects our most fundamental rights and freedoms and...it is the foundation of our democracy."

Related stories: Keep up with The National Law Journal's continuing coverage of the Kagan nomination.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Blue Eco Legal Council

    May 10, 2010 10:14 PM

    Our group sued the FBI for violating federal environmental law by discharging lead bullets into Lake Michigan. The DOJ advanced the legal argument that there are discrete areas of the lake such that we have no standing for its discharges 13 miles to the north. We asserted that the lake rotates to the south and therefore have standing. The DOJ attorney even denied lake rotation on direct questioning in the 7th Circuit during our appeal of our dismissal.



    After the 7th Circuit affirmed our dismissal we obtained a document that DOJ withheld despite the district court order to produce. The document stated that the government (and the DOJ attorneys who reviewed and withheld it) knew about lake rotation. THis amounts to perjury and obstruction of justice. We therefore filed a motion for rehearing en banc alleging obstruction by asserting legal theories in reliance on withholding documents proving the opposite was true. Elena Kagan was the solicitor general at that point and did not see fit to respond to our petition. We filed a complaint with the office of professional responsibility shortly thereafter, around November 2009 but to date they have not even confirmed receiving our complaint. We obtained funding from Freshwater Future, an environmental 501(c)(3), to file a petition with US Supreme Court. Elena Kagan once again failed to address our allegations that the government win was based on deception and fraud and that based on its arguments and the truth we do have standing because the lake will bring the pollutants towards our drinking water.



    Elena Kagan has no honor as she stood by and watched the Department of Justice obstruct justice, violate our rights, and allow the government to continue violating the law by discharging its lead waste into Lake Michigan. This is someone who obviously has no regard for the law, the legal system, or fair play.



    Steven Pollack, Attorney

    Director Blue Eco Legal Council

    www.ecoesq.com

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Harvard
  • Republicans
  • Democrats
  • Senate Judiciary Committee
  • University of Chicago
  • American University
  • Committee for Justice
  • Princeton University
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Harvard
  • Republicans
  • Democrats
  • Senate Judiciary Committee
  • University of Chicago
  • American University
  • Committee for Justice
  • Princeton University

Key categories

    
  • Law Schools
  • US Supreme Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  4. Law for Laymen
    •      
  5. Law for Laymen
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

LegalTech West Coast to Kick Off With 'Tech Audit' Keynote

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lenders Win On Foreclosures
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Justices: Doc Interviews With Defense Are Attorney Work Product
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Law.com Network
  • ADVERTISE

law.com

  • Tour the New Site
  • Newswire
  • Special Reports
  • International News
  • Lists, Surveys & Rankings
  • Legal Blogs
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Site Map

alm national

  • The American Lawyer
  • The Am Law Litigation Daily
  • Corporate Counsel
  • Law Technology News
  • The National Law Journal

alm regional

  • Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Daily Business Review (FL)
  • Delaware Law Weekly
  • Daily Report (GA)
  • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
  • New Jersey Law Journal
  • New York Law Journal
  • GC New York
  • The Recorder (CA)
  • Texas Lawyer
  • The Asian Lawyer
  • Focus Europe

directories

  • ALM Experts
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • In-House Law Departments at the Top 500 Companies
  • Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Legal Recruiter's Directory
  • Corporate Counsel Top Rated Lawyers
  • The National Law Journal Leadership Profiles
  • National Directory of Minority Attorneys
  • Go-To Law firms of the Top 500 Companies

books & newsletters

  • Best-Selling Books
  • Publication E-Alerts
  • Law Journal Newsletters
  • LawCatalog Store
  • Law Journal Press Online

research

  • ALM Legal Intelligence
  • Court Reporters
  • MA 3000
  • Verdict Search
  • ALM Experts
  • Legal Dictionary
  • Smart Litigator

events & conferences

  • ALM Events
  • LegalTech®
  • Virtual LegalTech®
  • Virtual Events
  • Webinars & Online Events
  • Insight Information

reprints

  • Reprints

online cle

  • CLE Center

career

  • Lawjobs
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions |  ALM User License Agreement