Cap-and-Trade to Court Again
A recent lawsuit, if successful, could significantly increase the costs of compliance, explain Paul Hastings attorneys.

A recent lawsuit, if successful, could significantly increase the costs of compliance, explain Paul Hastings attorneys.

An Alameda County judge sided with a plaintiff's argument that BAAQMD thresholds were themselves a CEQA project requiring impact analysis, explains Todd Williams of Wendel Rosen.

When it comes to wind and solar farms, suitable, unencumbered land is California's scarce resource, explain Farella attorneys.

Coming to the table at the outset of the dispute often leaves parties with broader options for negotiations and mutually acceptable resolution, advises Richard McAdams of JAMS.

Implementation of AB32 is bogged down by delays every step of the way, creating a climate of speculation, explains Robert Lawrence of Marten Law.

A quarter century after passage, the California law still helps consumers make informed choices about products affecting their health, says Carol J. Monohan-Cummings of OEHHA.

Recent legislation and a Supreme Court decision create uncertainty in the windup process of government agencies, explain Latham & Watkins attorneys.

California GHG regulations are soon to be finalized, but opponents may have several tools to attack the new rules, explain Marten Law attorneys.

GHG regulations are taking effect in just over a year, but lots of work remains to be done if they are to succeed, explain Marten Law attorneys.
When compliance with federal and local laws is at issue, knowing where to look is key to ensuring not running afoul of either, explains Helen Kang of Golden Gate University School of Law.

Recent legislation requires one-third of energy sold in California to come from renewable sources by 2020, explains Golden Gate University's Deborah Behles.

New proposal for regulations of hazardous chemicals in products has revived a previously halted effort, explain Barg Coffin attorneys.

A rushed implementation of AB 32 is the cause for its grinding halt, as a court orders the state to review climate-change alternatives, explains Alan Ramo of Golden Gate University School of Law.

To save AB32 from a permanent injunction, Air Resource Board has to demonstrate its plan is superior to the alternatives, explain Orrick attorneys.

Proposed California regulations conflict with federal law and subject potentially vast areas of land to new permitting requirements, advise Barg Coffin attorneys.
Disposing of unused medication is a looming problem sure to have manufacturers and local governments wrestling with cost control, explains Hastings' Marsha Cohen.

Ninth Circuit gives local air districts a backdoor to regulating construction equipment, say Alston & Bird attorneys.

With defeat of Prop 23, pollution reduction is back on course, with the ARB implementing regulations to promote compliance, explains Hastings' Steven Bonorris.

Alston & Bird attorneys explain that even if the initiative passes, another California law will still drive clean energy and pollution reduction.

Project mangers and developers should be familiar with new environmental regulations and their recent interpration by California courts and agencies, advises Matthew Francois of Sedgwick.