CalSupremeCt-Grants-061312

2012-06-13 12:00:00 AM

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6515
RICHARD BOYSEL, Petitioner,
v.
SUPERJOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent:

THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

No. S202324
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three - No. G045202
Filed June 13, 2012

The petition for review is granted.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6516
KEVIN MICHAEL REILLY, Petitioner,
v.
SUPERlOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent;

THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

No. S202280
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three - No. G045118
Filed June 13, 2012

The petition for review is granted.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6516
JAMES WRlGHT, Petitioner,
v.
SUPERlOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent;

THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

No. S202320
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three - No. G045203
Filed June 13, 2012

The petition for review is granted.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J.,
CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6517
ANNEMARIE DONKIN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
RODNEY E. DONKIN, JR. et al., as Trustees, etc., Defendants and Appellants.

No. S202210
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division One - No. B228704
Filed June 13, 2012

The petition for review is granted.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6517
In re JOEY V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
JOEY V., Defendant and Appellant.

No. S201376
In the Supreme Court of California
Fifth Appellate District - No. 1'0620.'11
Filed June 13, 2012

The petition for review is granted.
Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in In re W.B., S181638 (see Cal. Rules ofColirl. rule 8.5 12(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6518
STEPHEN MICHAEL MAYERS, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
VOLT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Appellants.

No. S200709
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division Tbree - No. G045036
Filed June 13, 2012

The petition for review is granted.
Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co., S199119 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.5 12(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520. is deferred pending further order of the court.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6518
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Petitioner,
v.
SUPERlOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent;

CYNTHIA ANDERSON-BARKER, Real Party in Interest.

No. S201534
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Eight - No. B239849
Filed June 13, 2012

Petition for review granted.
The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, with directions to vacate its order denying mandate and to issue an order directing respondent Anderson-Barker to show cause why the relief sought in the petition should not be granted.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6519
LAWRENCE ESPER, Petitioner,
v.
SUPERlOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent;

THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

No. S201681
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three - No. G046031
Filed June 13, 2012

The petition for review is granted.
The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, with directions to vacate its order denying mandate/prohibition and to issue an alternative writ to be heard before that court when the proceeding is ordered on calendar.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6519
JOHN D. KONEK, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
TOWN SQUARE PROPERTIES, Defendant and Respondent.

No. S202500
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three - No. G045375
Filed June 13, 2012

At the request of the Court of Appeal, review is ordered on this court's own motion. The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, with directions to vacate its April 6, 2012 order and reconsider the matter as it sees fit.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6520
In re HO THAI NGUYEN on Habeas Corpus.

No. S197806
In the Supreme Court of California
Filed June 13, 2012

The Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is ordered to show cause before the Santa Clara County Superior Court, when the matter is placed on calendar, why petitioner is not entitled, as conceded by the Attorney General in the informal response filed in this court on March 21, 2012, to the striking of the parole revocation fine imposed pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.45 because petitioner's scntence does not include a period of parole (see People v. Jenkins (2006) 140 CaLApp.4th 805, 819). The return is to be filed on or before July 13, 2012.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6520
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
JOSEPH ROBERT HORVATH, Defendant and Appellant.
No. S201755
In the Supreme Court of California
Third Appellate District - No. C063198
Filed June 13, 2012

The petition for review is denied.
The Reporter of Decisions is directed not to publish in the Official Appellate Reports the opinion in the above entitled appeal filed March 8, 2012, which appears at 204 Cal.App.4th 100. (Cal. Const., art. VI, section 14; rule 8.1125(c)(l), Cal. Rules of Court.)

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6521
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
DALE FRANKLIN WENSINGER, Defendant and Appellant.

No. S201578
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three - No. G044400
Filed June 13, 2012

The petitions for review are denied.
The Reporter of Decisions is directed not to publish in the Official Appellate Reports the opinion in the above entitled appeal March 7, 2012, which appears at 204 Cal.App.4th 90. (Cal. Const., art. VI, section 14; rule 8.l125(c)(I), Cal. Rules of Court.).,

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6521
D.D., Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF STOCKTON et al., Defendants and Respondents,

No. S176451
In the Supreme Court of California
Third Appellate District - No. C057260
Filed June 13, 2012

In light of the decision in Quarry v, Doe (2012) 53 Cal.4th 945, review in this matter is dismissed.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6522
JOHN DOE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN DIEGO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. S178748
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Eight - No. B209557
Filed June 13, 2012

In light of the decision in Quarry v. Doe (2012) 53 Cal.4th 945, review in this matter is dismissed.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6522
JOHN DOE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF STOCKTON, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. S192658
In the Supreme Court of California
Third Appellate District - No. C064094
Filed June 13, 2012

In light of the decision in Quarry v. Doe (2012) 53 Cal.4th 945, review in this matter is dismissed.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6523
DOE 3, Petitioner,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent;

JANE CA DOE, Real Party in Interest.

No. S190692
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division One - No. D058972
Filed June 13, 2012

In light of the decision in Quarry v. Doe (2012) 53 Ca1.4th 945, review in this matter is dismissed.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6523
K. J., Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF STOCKTON, Defendant and Respondent.

No. S173042
In the Supreme Court of California
Third Appellate District - No. C058034
Filed June 13, 2012

In light of the decision in Quarry v. Doe (2012) 53 Cal.4th 945, review in this matter is dismissed.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6524
L.A., Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF STOCKTON et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. S176483
In the Supreme Court of California
Third Appellate District - No. C057895
Filed June 13, 2012

In light of the decision in Quarry v. Doe (2012) 53 Cal.4th 945, review in this matter is dismissed.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6524
JANE ROE 21, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
DEFENDANT DOE 1 el al., Defendants and Respondents

No. S189814
In the Supreme Court of California
Third Appellate District - No. C062505
Filed June 13, 2012

In light of the decision in Quarry v. Doe I (2012) 53 Cal.4th 945, review in this matter is dismissed.
Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., was recused and did not participate.

BAXTER, Acting C. J., KENNARD, J.,
WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6525
JOHN ROE 58 et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
DEFENDANT DOE 1 et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. S190923
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Eight - No. 8215948
Filed June 13, 2012

In light of the decision in Quarry v. Doe (2012) 53 Cal.4th 945, review in this matter is dismissed.

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.