The Recorder
30-day free ttrial
  • Home
  • News
  • Cases & Courts
  • In Practice
  • Special Reports
  • Events
  • Lawjobs
  • About Us

Home > Plaintiffs Shop Hit With New Ethics Suit

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Plaintiffs Shop Hit With New Ethics Suit

By Scott Graham Contact All Articles 

The Recorder

February 21, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Mark Chavez, Chavez & Gertler founding partner

Mark Chavez, Chavez & Gertler founding partner
Image: The Recorder/Hillary Jones-Mixon

SAN FRANCISCO — Upping the ante in their fight over class action ethics, two Bay Area attorneys have sued one of the state's largest plaintiff shops, alleging that it's a vehicle for hiding assets from their $20 million fraud suit.

Mark Chavez and Richard Zitrin allege that after they brought a fraud suit against Initiative Legal Group last summer, the firm began shifting its most valuable asset — pending contingency fee cases — to a new firm called Capstone Law APC.

Since October, 48 attorneys from Initiative Legal Group, or ILG as it's known, have moved to Capstone, which is housed in the same Century City business complex as ILG. Many of those attorneys have since appeared under Capstone's name in litigation that originated with ILG — but without filing substitution, association or even change-of-address forms, the attorneys allege.

"Throughout this process and by these means, defendants fraudulently transferred ILG's assets, including ILG's interest in dozens of civil actions ... to Capstone," states the complaint signed by Chavez, of Chavez & Gertler. Maxon v. Capstone Law, CGC-13-528884, was filed Thursday in San Francisco Superior Court.

The litigation all stems from wage-and-hour claims Initiative Legal Group first brought against Wells Fargo in 2006. It began as a class action, but the firm later signed up 600 individual mortgage consultants for a mass action. Chavez and Zitrin, of Carlson, Calladine & Peterson, alleged that ILG sold out those 600 clients by negotiating a secret $6 million settlement with Wells Fargo, keeping $5.5 million for itself in attorney fees. "Your clients withheld material information," S.F. Superior Court Judge Harold Kahn told a lawyer for ILG at a September hearing. "They violated their ethical obligations of disclosure and fair dealing. Did I miss something?"

Kahn entered a temporary restraining order freezing the $5.5 million and putting it in an escrow account. ILG is appealing that ruling, though it hasn't filed an opening brief yet.

Around the same time, Chavez, Zitrin and David C. Anderson of Anderson Law brought a putative class action against ILG and several of its principals for fraud, saying some of the 600 clients had claims worth more than $100,000 but received only a $750 payout. ILG tried to head off the claims last August by offering all 600 clients an additional $1,000 if they agreed to sign a waiver not to sue the firm.

Chavez alleges in Thursday's complaint that, four days after sending out the $1,000 checks, ILG partner Rebecca Labat Crosby incorporated Capstone Law. Capstone has since added 56 attorneys, 48 of them from ILG, and brought at least 27 ILG cases with them. "Throughout the fall of 2012, as attorneys moved from ILG to Capstone, defendants worked in concert to transfer to Capstone dozens of active cases in which ILG held a contingent attorneys' fee interest," the complaint states. "The interest in these litigation matters ... is ILG's most valuable asset, and without it, ILG will be unable to satisfy plaintiff and the clients' claims."

Crosby, meanwhile, has continued to act for both entities, filing a Sept. 27 declaration in a federal case in which she represented herself as a partner at ILG, the complaint alleges.

Capstone, meanwhile, has not updated its corporate filing with the State Bar — nor has it updated Crosby's personal guarantee of $100,000 for errors and omissions. With 57 attorneys, the firm is required to raise that guarantee to $5 million, the complaint alleges.

Zitrin and Chavez also say in their complaint that Capstone, Crosby and ILG principals Marc Primo, G. Arthur Meneses and Monica Balderrama violated the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and other laws. It seeks a receivership for Capstone and contends that all ILG attorneys who moved cases to Capstone should be jointly and severally liable for damages.

Natalie Vance, an attorney who represented ILG before Kahn and on appeal, declined to comment, saying she does not represent Capstone.

Editor's note: Zitrin is a contributing writer for The Recorder.



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Chavez & Gertler

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • The Recorder
  • Initiative Legal Group
  • State Bar
  • Carlson, Calladine & Peterson
  • Superior Court
  • Wells Fargo & Co.

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Ninth Circuit Pooh-Poohs Coupons in HP Printer Case
    •      
  2. Facebook GC Is Leaving Company
    •      
  3. 'Cloud Company' in Spat With Porn Maker
    •      
  4. At Ninth Circuit, Moderates Do the Talking
    •      
  5. Brown Offers No New Money for Courts
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media