The Recorder
30-day free ttrial
  • Home
  • News
  • Cases & Courts
  • In Practice
  • Special Reports
  • Events
  • Lawjobs
  • About Us

Home > Feds Win Round in Med Pot Crackdown

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Feds Win Round in Med Pot Crackdown

By Vanessa Blum Contact All Articles 

The Recorder

February 14, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 
U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, Northern District of California

U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, Northern District of California
Image: Jason Doiy/The Recorder

SAN FRANCISCO — Score one for U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag and the Justice Department in their controversial offensive against medical marijuana dispensaries in the Bay Area.

A federal judge Thursday sided with the feds and dismissed a suit brought by the city of Oakland, which sought to block federal law enforcement from shutting down Harborside Health Center, California's largest marijuana retailer.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James said Oakland, represented pro bono by Morrison & Foerster partner Cedric Chao, lacked standing to challenge the federal forfeiture action because it does not hold an interest in the property.

"The forfeiture proceeding is focused on the defendant property and only those with specific interests in that property are authorized to participate in the proceeding," James wrote in a 10-page decision.

Harborside and its landlords in Oakland and San Jose are opposing forfeiture.

In the suit, Oakland claimed the city had a separate and unique interest in preserving a regulated system for the sale of medical marijuana. Closing dispensaries like Harborside would drive patients to the black market and drain Oakland's coffers of $1.4 million in annual business tax revenues, the suit alleged.

Chao argued last month in opposition to the government's motion to dismiss. No decision has yet been made on whether to appeal, he said.

James called the city's concerns "significant and wide-reaching" but said they could not convey standing.

Moreover, filing a forfeiture suit does not constitute a "final agency action" as defined by the Administrative Procedures Act, because consequences ultimately would lie in the hands of a judge or jury, James ruled.

"At most, the government's conduct merely initiated that process," she stated.

Chao said the decision "leads to an unfair and illogical result."

"It can't be right that Oakland and its 400,000 citizens have no access to the courts," he said. "That just can't be the right answer."



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Avon

    February 15, 2013 11:32 AM

    The magistrate judge did not say the City lacked standing to challenge the forfeiture action; she held that it had lacked standing to participate in the forfeiture action. That, in fact, is why the City is the plaintiff here - it filed this suit to challenge the forfeiture itself by seeking to enjoin its enforcement.
    Then she dismissed this suit on APA grounds, holding that a lack of standing is no reason to find that the APA's prerequisite (exhaustion of remedies) was met. Whether the City was right to protest that that's a Catch-22 situation is for us readers to decide ... or, perhaps, a higher court.

    Or, a higher Judge. My question is: Why did this case assignment to a magistrate judge include deciding a dispositive motion? The caption on her opinion suggests that a District Judge was never even assigned, or possibly that the parties had waived it, or that some rule made the case ineligible for one.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Morrison & Foerster

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Harborside Health Center
  • Justice Department

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  2. Pass Rate on February Bar Exam Was 41 Percent
    •      
  3. Judge Strikes Arbitration Agreement in Suit Against Ma Labs
    •      
  4. Juror's Online Research Forces New Trial
    •      
  5. Ninth Circuit Strikes Arizona Abortion Law
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

EEOC Gets Tough With Companies on Genetic Privacy

Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Circuit Reinstates Lawsuit by Inmate Over Cell Conditions
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Custody Ruling in Bitter Fight May Turn on 11-Year-Old's Wish
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Filing Blunder To Cost $142,600
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court: Injured College Student Can't Sue State
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media