The Recorder
30-day free ttrial
  • Home
  • News
  • Cases & Courts
  • In Practice
  • Special Reports
  • Events
  • Lawjobs
  • About Us

Home > Feds Win Round in Med Pot Crackdown

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Feds Win Round in Med Pot Crackdown

By Vanessa Blum Contact All Articles 

The Recorder

February 14, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 
U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, Northern District of California

U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, Northern District of California
Image: Jason Doiy/The Recorder

SAN FRANCISCO — Score one for U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag and the Justice Department in their controversial offensive against medical marijuana dispensaries in the Bay Area.

A federal judge Thursday sided with the feds and dismissed a suit brought by the city of Oakland, which sought to block federal law enforcement from shutting down Harborside Health Center, California's largest marijuana retailer.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James said Oakland, represented pro bono by Morrison & Foerster partner Cedric Chao, lacked standing to challenge the federal forfeiture action because it does not hold an interest in the property.

"The forfeiture proceeding is focused on the defendant property and only those with specific interests in that property are authorized to participate in the proceeding," James wrote in a 10-page decision.

Harborside and its landlords in Oakland and San Jose are opposing forfeiture.

In the suit, Oakland claimed the city had a separate and unique interest in preserving a regulated system for the sale of medical marijuana. Closing dispensaries like Harborside would drive patients to the black market and drain Oakland's coffers of $1.4 million in annual business tax revenues, the suit alleged.

Chao argued last month in opposition to the government's motion to dismiss. No decision has yet been made on whether to appeal, he said.

James called the city's concerns "significant and wide-reaching" but said they could not convey standing.

Moreover, filing a forfeiture suit does not constitute a "final agency action" as defined by the Administrative Procedures Act, because consequences ultimately would lie in the hands of a judge or jury, James ruled.

"At most, the government's conduct merely initiated that process," she stated.

Chao said the decision "leads to an unfair and illogical result."

"It can't be right that Oakland and its 400,000 citizens have no access to the courts," he said. "That just can't be the right answer."



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Avon

    February 15, 2013 11:32 AM

    The magistrate judge did not say the City lacked standing to challenge the forfeiture action; she held that it had lacked standing to participate in the forfeiture action. That, in fact, is why the City is the plaintiff here - it filed this suit to challenge the forfeiture itself by seeking to enjoin its enforcement.
    Then she dismissed this suit on APA grounds, holding that a lack of standing is no reason to find that the APA's prerequisite (exhaustion of remedies) was met. Whether the City was right to protest that that's a Catch-22 situation is for us readers to decide ... or, perhaps, a higher court.

    Or, a higher Judge. My question is: Why did this case assignment to a magistrate judge include deciding a dispositive motion? The caption on her opinion suggests that a District Judge was never even assigned, or possibly that the parties had waived it, or that some rule made the case ineligible for one.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Morrison & Foerster

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Harborside Health Center
  • Justice Department

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  2. Ninth Circuit Pooh-Poohs Coupons in HP Printer Case
    •      
  3. Judge Strikes Arbitration Agreement in Suit Against Ma Labs
    •      
  4. Brown Offers No New Money for Courts
    •      
  5. Alsup Awards $203 Million Against Wells Fargo, Again
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge Declines to Block Act-of-War Defense in 9/11 Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Panel Finds 'Excessive' City Fine for Poaching Antenna From Trash
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive

Ex-College QB Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Brooks Looks To Political Ally For Criminal Defense

Attorney Fee Hearing in Waffle House Sex Case Heats Up
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media