The Recorder
30-day free ttrial
  • Home
  • News
  • Cases & Courts
  • In Practice
  • Special Reports
  • Events
  • Lawjobs
  • About Us

Home > MGA Sues to Vacate $23 Million Arbitration Award for Orrick

Font Size: increase font decrease font

MGA Sues to Vacate $23 Million Arbitration Award for Orrick

By Julia Love Contact All Articles 

The Recorder

February 5, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

SAN FRANCISCO — MGA Entertainment has moved to vacate a $23 million arbitration award made to Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to compensate the firm for its work on behalf of the toymaker in its hotly contested battle with Mattel over its Bratz dolls.

MGA Entertainment — represented by Connor, Fletcher & Williams — argued in court papers filed Monday in Orange County Superior Court, MGA Entertainment v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, 00628354, that the arbitrators did not have the authority to grant the preliminary award in the middle of arbitration. On Jan. 25, a JAMS panel had issued a partial award to Orrick that consisted of a $23 million lien on the proceeds of MGA Entertainment's copyright case against Mattel Inc., according to the filing. The award also called for Orrick to submit a $100,000 bond to maintain the prejudgment lien.

"The arbitrators in the arbitration proceedings below have greatly exceeded their powers," Edmond Connor wrote in the petition. "Arbitrators have limited jurisdiction, and generally do not possess the same power to order interim relief that a trial court has — even if the parties agree to confer such power on the arbitrators."

The parties entered arbitration to resolve a dispute over legal fees that Orrick claims MGA Entertainment owes it for its work in the long-running litigation. MGA is also asking the court to void the Confidential Arbitration Agreement because Orrick publicly disclosed the value of the award. Representatives for Orrick did not respond to requests for comment.

"This was a vitally important provision of the Confidential Arbitration Agreement, and formed a material part of the consideration for MGA's agreement to arbitrate its disputes with Orrick," the petition reads.

MGA also filed a petition on Feb. 4 to seal the records.

MGA has had strained relationships with the various firms that have represented it in the Bratz litigation. Orrick fired MGA as a client in October 2011 over unpaid legal bills, shortly after Irvine criminal defense attorney Jennifer Keller was brought in to serve as co-counsel with Orrick lawyers in the retrial with Mattel. O'Melveny & Myers, which represented MGA from 2004 to 2007, settled with the toymaker over unpaid legal fees in November 2011.

Another episode in the long-standing litigation appeared to have been resolved late last month. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned MGA's $170 million trade secret award but let stand a $137 million award to the toymaker for the attorney fees and costs it incurred in its years-long litigation with Mattel.



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • O'Melveny & Myers
  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Confidential Arbitration Agreement
  • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe
  • Connor, Fletcher & Williams
  • Ninth Circuit
  • MGA Entertainment
  • Mattel Inc.
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  2. Ninth Circuit Pooh-Poohs Coupons in HP Printer Case
    •      
  3. Judge Strikes Arbitration Agreement in Suit Against Ma Labs
    •      
  4. Brown Offers No New Money for Courts
    •      
  5. Ninth Circuit Hears Oyster Farm Case
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

Judge Orders Parties to Hire Expert to Probe Facebook

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Brooks Looks To Political Ally For Criminal Defense

Attorney Fee Hearing in Waffle House Sex Case Heats Up
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media