The Recorder
30-day free ttrial
  • Home
  • News
  • Cases & Courts
  • In Practice
  • Special Reports
  • Events
  • Lawjobs
  • About Us

Home > MGA Sues to Vacate $23 Million Arbitration Award for Orrick

Font Size: increase font decrease font

MGA Sues to Vacate $23 Million Arbitration Award for Orrick

By Julia Love Contact All Articles 

The Recorder

February 5, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

SAN FRANCISCO — MGA Entertainment has moved to vacate a $23 million arbitration award made to Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to compensate the firm for its work on behalf of the toymaker in its hotly contested battle with Mattel over its Bratz dolls.

MGA Entertainment — represented by Connor, Fletcher & Williams — argued in court papers filed Monday in Orange County Superior Court, MGA Entertainment v. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, 00628354, that the arbitrators did not have the authority to grant the preliminary award in the middle of arbitration. On Jan. 25, a JAMS panel had issued a partial award to Orrick that consisted of a $23 million lien on the proceeds of MGA Entertainment's copyright case against Mattel Inc., according to the filing. The award also called for Orrick to submit a $100,000 bond to maintain the prejudgment lien.

"The arbitrators in the arbitration proceedings below have greatly exceeded their powers," Edmond Connor wrote in the petition. "Arbitrators have limited jurisdiction, and generally do not possess the same power to order interim relief that a trial court has — even if the parties agree to confer such power on the arbitrators."

The parties entered arbitration to resolve a dispute over legal fees that Orrick claims MGA Entertainment owes it for its work in the long-running litigation. MGA is also asking the court to void the Confidential Arbitration Agreement because Orrick publicly disclosed the value of the award. Representatives for Orrick did not respond to requests for comment.

"This was a vitally important provision of the Confidential Arbitration Agreement, and formed a material part of the consideration for MGA's agreement to arbitrate its disputes with Orrick," the petition reads.

MGA also filed a petition on Feb. 4 to seal the records.

MGA has had strained relationships with the various firms that have represented it in the Bratz litigation. Orrick fired MGA as a client in October 2011 over unpaid legal bills, shortly after Irvine criminal defense attorney Jennifer Keller was brought in to serve as co-counsel with Orrick lawyers in the retrial with Mattel. O'Melveny & Myers, which represented MGA from 2004 to 2007, settled with the toymaker over unpaid legal fees in November 2011.

Another episode in the long-standing litigation appeared to have been resolved late last month. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned MGA's $170 million trade secret award but let stand a $137 million award to the toymaker for the attorney fees and costs it incurred in its years-long litigation with Mattel.



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • O'Melveny & Myers
  • Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Confidential Arbitration Agreement
  • Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe
  • Connor, Fletcher & Williams
  • Ninth Circuit
  • MGA Entertainment
  • Mattel Inc.
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution

Most viewed stories

    
  1. After Apple Lashes Out at Morgan Lewis, Patent Holder Fires Back
    •      
  2. In Patent Dispute, Tesla Plays Offense
    •      
  3. In Internet Porn Spat, Prenda Claims Judge Overstepped
    •      
  4. Graffiti Case Pushes for More Punitives
    •      
  5. At Hersh Firm, a Bad Break
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

3rd Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Texas DA Faces Removal Suits Over DWI, Alleged Misconduct
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media