The Recorder
30-day free ttrial
  • Home
  • News
  • Cases & Courts
  • In Practice
  • Special Reports
  • Events
  • Lawjobs
  • About Us

Home > Oyster Farm Loses Bid to Stay Open

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Oyster Farm Loses Bid to Stay Open

By Scott Graham Contact All Articles 

The Recorder

February 4, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

SAN FRANCISCO — There is no joy in mudville. A family-owned oyster farm in the Point Reyes National Seashore has struck out in a federal court bid to maintain operations.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled Monday that she had no jurisdiction to intervene in the dispute between Drakes Bay Oyster Co. and the U.S. Department of the Interior. And even if she did have jurisdiction, Gonzalez Rogers would be ruling for the government, she wrote.

The farm, located in the Drakes Bay Estero, has operated under a 40-year lease with the federal government that expired Nov. 30. Since the estuary's designation as potential wilderness in 1976, the business has been the only entity standing in the way of full wilderness status.

Although Interior Secretary Kenneth Salazar had acknowledged "scientific uncertainty and a lack of consensus in the record regarding the precise nature and scope of the impacts" of the company's operations, he declined to renew the company's permit in November.

The company mounted an aggressive challenge to that decision, with more than 80 spectators — both company supporters and environmental advocates opposed to continued farming — turning out for last month's federal court hearing in Gonzalez Rogers' Oakland courtroom.

"The court finds that, generally, courts do have jurisdiction to review an agency's inaction, or failure to act, on a permit," Gonzalez Rogers wrote. "However, where, as here, Congress has authorized the secretary to act (or not act) on a specific, discrete circumstance with discretion, that particular act falls within" a provision of the Administrative Procedure Act that precludes jurisdiction.

Even if she had jurisdiction, "plaintiffs have not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of the claims nor that the balancing of the equities favors injunctive relief," Gonzalez Rogers wrote.

Environmentalists were elated by the decision. "The court ruling affirms that our national parks will be safe from privatization schemes, and that special places like Drakes Estero will rise above attempts to hijack Americans' wilderness," said Neil Desai, of the National Parks Conservation Association, in a written statement. "Taxpayers can rejoice that the land they bought and own in Point Reyes National Seashore will now be protected as planned after 40 years of waiting."

A lawyer for the oyster farm owners said they weren't yet prepared to comment on the ruling.



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Drakes Bay Oyster Co.
  • National Parks Conservation Association
  • United States Department of the Interior

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  2. Pass Rate on February Bar Exam Was 41 Percent
    •      
  3. Juror's Online Research Forces New Trial
    •      
  4. Viewpoint: Court Struggles to Regulate Attorney Blogging
    •      
  5. Ninth Circuit Strikes Arizona Abortion Law
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media