The Recorder
30-day free ttrial
  • Home
  • News
  • Cases & Courts
  • In Practice
  • Special Reports
  • Events
  • Lawjobs
  • About Us

Home > Letter to the Editor

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Letter to the Editor

The Recorder

November 21, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Any changes to the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act sponsored by trial lawyers and their trade group, Consumer Attorneys of California, can mean only one thing: another attempt to change MICRA to make it easier for trial lawyers to file lawsuits against health care providers in California ("Stars Aligning for MICRA Reform?", Nov. 16). At a time when we should be doing all we can to rein in costs, this change would have the opposite effect and would increase health care costs in California by billions.

MICRA ensures injured patients are protected and fairly compensated, while also limiting frivolous lawsuits. Under MICRA, all economic costs (out-of-pocket costs, lost wages, medical care) are covered on an unlimited basis. Punitive damages, too, are unlimited. And MICRA provides for up to $250,000 in non-economic damages, pain and suffering damages.

Californians Allied for Patient Protection, or CAPP, is a broad coalition of MICRA supporters including physicians, hospitals, community clinics, nurses, dentists, local governments, businesses and others.

The reasonable $250,000 cap on non-economic damages is an effective way of limiting meritless lawsuits and keeping health care costs lower, but has been targeted by trial lawyers because it restricts the amount of money they can collect in damage awards.

CAPP members strongly oppose the change trial lawyers want to quadruple the $250,000 in non-economic damages cap, thus making it easier and more lucrative to file lawsuits. If trial lawyers are successful, health care costs will increase dramatically, medical liability rates will go up, and access to health care providers will diminish. In fact, a recent study found that doubling MICRA's cap on non-economic damages would add more than $9 billion annually to the cost of health care in California.

More lawsuits do nothing to improve health care. They only enrich lawyers at the expense of everyone else who will pay higher costs and will have reduced access to health care services.

Lisa Maas

Sacramento

You can send Letters to the Editor to The Recorder, 1035 Market St., Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94103; by fax at 415-490-9997; or by email at recorder-editor@alm.com.



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Ninth Circuit Pooh-Poohs Coupons in HP Printer Case
    •      
  2. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  3. 'Cloud Company' in Spat With Porn Maker
    •      
  4. Brown Offers No New Money for Courts
    •      
  5. Judge Strikes Arbitration Agreement in Suit Against Ma Labs
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Three Strategies for Reducing Class Action Costs

Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media