CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7177
In re ABELINO MANRIQUEZ on Habeas Corpus.
No. S141210
In the Supreme Court of California
Filed June 20, 2012
The Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is ordered to show cause in this court, when the matter is placed on calendar, why the relief prayed for should not be granted on the ground of juror misconduct, as alleged in Claim 2 of the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed February 17,2006, and amended on January 10, 2008.
The return must be filed on or before July 20, 2012.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7178
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
OLGA RUTTERSCHMIDT et al., Defendants and Appellant s.
No. S176213
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Five - No. B209568
Filed June 20, 2012
The parties are requested to serve and file supplemental briefs addressing the significance, if any, of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Williams v. Illinois (June 18, 2012) _ U.S. _ [2012 WL 2202981]. Those briefs are to be filed on or before July 5, 2012. Upon the filing of those briefs , each party will then have until July 16, 2012, to serve and file a response to the brief submitted by the opposing party.
Submission of the cause is vacated. (See Cal Rules of Court, rule 8.524(h)(l) [submission runs from expiration of the time in which to file briefs, including supplemental briefs].) The cause will be resubmitted upon timely filing of the response briefs.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7178
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
VIRGINIA HERNANDEZ LOPEZ, Defendant and Appellant.
No. S177046
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District.
Division One - No. D052885
Filed June 20, 2012
The parties are requested to serve and file supplemental briefs addressing the significance, if any, of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Williams v. Illinois (June 18, 2012) _ U.S. _ [2012 WL 2202981]. Those briefs are to be filed on or before July 5, 2012. Upon the filing of those briefs, each party will then have until July 16, 2012, to serve and file a response to the brief submitted by the opposing party.
Submission of the cause is vacated. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.524(h)(1) [submission runs from expiration of the time in which to file briefs, including supplemental briefs].) The cause will be resubmitted upon timely filing of the response briefs.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7179
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
REYNALDO SANTOS DUNGO, Defendant and Appellant.
No. S176886
In the Supreme Court of California
Third Appellate District - No. C055923
Filed June 20, 2012
The parties are requested to serve and file supplemental briefs addressing the significance, if any, of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Williams v. Illinois (June 18, 2012) _ U.S __ [2012 WL 2202981] Those briefs are to be filed on or before July 5, 20 12. Upon the filing of those briefs, each party will then have until July 16,2012, to serve and file a response to the brief submitted by the opposing party.
Submission of the cause is vacated. (Sec Cal Rules of Court, rule 8.524(h)(1) [submission runs from expiration of the time in which to file briefs, including supplemental briefs].) The cause will be resubmitted upon timely filing of the response briefs .
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7179
RICHARD BOYSEL, Petitioner,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent;
THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.
No. S202324
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three - No. G045202
Filed June 20, 2012
On June 13,2012, the court granted the petition s for review in Reilly v. Superior Court (3202280), Boysel v. Superior Court (3202324), and Wright v. Superior Court (S202 320). At this time, the court designates Reilly the lead case and defers further action in Boysel and Wright pending consideration and disposition of related issues in Reilly or pending further order of the court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2).)
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7180
MICHAEL ALEMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR, Defendant and Respondent.
No. S199642
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Two - No. B231142
Filed June 20, 2012
The matter is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two, for reconsideration in light of Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc. (20 12) 53 Cal.4th 1244.
Werdegar, J., was recused and did not participate.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7180
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE WAGE AND HOUR CASES
No. S197722
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Eight - No. B227556
Filed June 20, 2012
In light of Kirby v. lmmoos Fire Protection, Inc. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1244, review in the above-entitled matter is dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 8.528( b)( J).)
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7181
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE WAGE AND HOUR CASES
THOMAS McGANN, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC, Defendant and Respondent.
No. S201681
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Eight - No. B22709
Filed June 20, 2012
In light of Kirby v. lmmoos Fire Protection, Inc. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1244, review in the above-entitled matter is dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 8.528 (b)(1).)
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7181
MATTHEW ZELASKO-BARRETT, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
BRAYTON-PURCELL LLP, Defendant and Respondent.
No. S198438
In the Supreme Court of California
First Appellate District
Division Three - No. A131601
Filed June 20, 2012
In light of Kirby v. lmmoos Fire Protection, Inc. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1244, review in the above-entitled matter is dismissed. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 8.528(b)(1).)
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7182
IN RE LAMPS PLUS OVERTIME CASES
No. S197806
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Eight - No. B220954
Filed June 20, 2012
The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (20 12) 53 Cal.4th 1004.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7182
JOSIE FAULKINBURY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
BOYD & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant and Respondent.
No. S184995
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division Three - No. G041702
Filed June 20, 2012
The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 CaI.4th 1004.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7183
ROGELIO HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRlLL, INC., Defendant and Respondent.
No. S188755
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Eight- No. B216004
Filed June 20, 2012
The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7183
BERNADETTE SANTOS, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v .
VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. S195866
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Eight - No. B222645
Filed June 20, 2012
The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J.,
CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7184
LES BRADLEY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
NETWORKERS INTERNATIONAL LLC, Defendant and Respondent.
No. S178748
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division One - No. D052365
Filed June 20, 2012
The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Ca1.4th 1004.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7184
KEVIN TIEN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v .
TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents .
No.
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Eight - No. B214333
Filed June 20, 2012
The cause is transferre d to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Divis ion Eight, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal. 4th 1004.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7185
MORRY BROOKLER, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.
No. S186357
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Seven - No. B212893
Filed June 20, 2012
The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal. Second Appellate District, Division Seven, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Ca lAth 1004.
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7185
TYRONE MULDROW et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
SURREX SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.
AND CONSOLIDATED CASE.
No. S200557
In the Supreme Court of California
Fourth Appellate District
Division One - Nos. D05795S/D058958
Filed June 20, 2012
The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) S3 Cal.4th 1004 .
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7186
FRED BRINKLEY, Plaintilff and Appellant ,
v.
PUBLIC STORAGE, Defendant and Respondent.
No. S168806
In the Supreme Court of California
Second Appellate District
Division Three - No.B200513
Filed June 13, 2012
The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the ca use in light of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Ca l.4th J 004 .
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J., KENNARD, J.,
BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., CORRIGAN, J., LIU, J.
