The Sixth District reinstated the long-running suit Tuesday, castigating a trial judge for buying Marvell's argument that Jasmine had lost standing when it sold the disputed trade secrets.
December 30, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — The Sixth District Court of Appeal on Tuesday roundly criticized and reversed Judge Thomas Edwards’ decision to dismiss the long-running trade secrets case brought by Jasmine Networks Inc. against Marvell Semiconductor Inc.
The case, featuring an accidental voicemail confession by Marvell’s general counsel, was finally headed to trial in Santa Clara County Superior Court after eight years of pretrial maneuvering, including a previous trip to the Sixth District.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
