Justice Carol Corrigan and a few others on the state Supreme Court looked ready Monday to let a restaurant get an injunction to stop a complaining neighbor from spreading defamatory words, rather than having to sue for damages after the fact.
January 30, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
SACRAMENTO � Individuals who unjustly defame others might soon find themselves muzzled by the courts.
A majority of the state Supreme Court indicated during oral arguments Monday that injunctions aimed at blocking speech found defamatory by a judge wouldn’t violate the United States or California constitutions’ free speech guarantees � if narrowly drawn.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
