State court reasonably rejected petitioner's claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to recall expert at sentencing to offer merely cumulative evidence about petitioner's mental state at time of crime (Ikuta, J.)
Font Size: 
Gulbrandson v. Ryan
9th Cir.
March 18, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The Recorder. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
