According to plaintiffs lawyers, a $172 million verdict wasn't enough to stop Wal-Mart from continuing to violate California's meal and rest break law. A judge is now considering whether the company should have a court-appointed supervisor to ensure compliance. Because the case is one of the few meal and rest break class actions to reach a trial verdict, the outcome of the injunctive relief phase could offer a rare glimpse into what measures a court may be willing to impose on a recalcitrant company.
Font Size: 
No Break for Wal-Mart on Its Meal Policy
The Recorder
June 29, 2006
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Law.com. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
