Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > Court Staffers Rally in Los Angeles Over Closure Plans

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Court Staffers Rally in Los Angeles Over Closure Plans

By Cheryl Miller All Articles 

The Recorder

March 18, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Several hundred court workers and community activists rallied in front of the Stanley Mosk Courthouse on Thursday, protesting the Los Angeles trial court's plans to close all or parts of 10 courthouses and consolidate services throughout the county.

"Our interest is not just with court workers," said Ian Thompson, a spokesman for Service Employees International Union Local 721, which represents about 3,400 Southern California court employees. "Our members, some of whom will lose their jobs if this goes through, are worried about public service."

Court leaders have announced that they will shutter eight courthouses completely and "remove most court work" from two other sites to deal with a budget deficit that could reach $85 million. Officials are also consolidating specific case types in limited locations. All unlawful detainer cases, for instance, must soon be filed in one of only five "hubs," forcing some litigants and lawyers to make lengthy commutes or public-transit trips to far-flung locations. Currently, tenants may appear in one of 26 neighborhood courtrooms throughout the county.

Court officials have also warned that approximately 500 jobs will be eliminated, although not all of the positions are currently filled.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Presiding Judge David Wesley said in a statement that his court no longer has the funding to keep neighborhood courts open.

"We are now being forced by budget cuts to make changes that will disadvantage litigants, attorneys, justice system partners and all court users across the spectrum and across our court," Wesley said.

In past years, court workers have directed their budget ire at the state Administrative Office of the Courts, accusing the centralized bureaucracy of profligate spending on pet projects at the trial courts' expense. This time, rally-goers expressed anger at L.A. judges for not consulting with labor or community groups before announcing the upcoming closures.

"The judges made the decision," Thompson said. "They launched this consolidation plan. They have the power to scale it back."

A statement released by the court Wednesday said court leaders met with "hundreds" of attorneys, law enforcement officials and county representatives before deciding on the closure plan.

Thursday's rally followed on the heels of a lawsuit filed by four community groups that claim reducing the number of courthouses where eviction cases are heard is unfair to poor tenants and those with disabilities. The complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in L.A., names Los Angeles Presiding Judge Wesley, Governor Jerry Brown and court executive officer Jack Clarke as defendants.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Administrative Office of the Courts
  • Service Employees International Union Local
  • US District Court
  • Superior Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  4. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  5. Law for Laymen
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media