Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • Top Rated Lawyers
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > For 80-Year-Old San Francisco Firm, IP Is a Family Tradition

Font Size: increase font decrease font

For 80-Year-Old San Francisco Firm, IP Is a Family Tradition

By Julia Love All Articles 

The Recorder

February 27, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Gregory Owen, Melville Owen and Noel Cook of Owen, Wickersham & Erickson

Gregory Owen, Melville Owen and Noel Cook of Owen, Wickersham & Erickson
Image: Jason Doiy/The Recorder

A portrait of a man wearing thick, black glasses and a half-smile hangs beside an ornate grandfather clock that belonged to him and his father, ticking steadily.

A. Donham Owen gave up his patent practice shortly before his death four decades ago. But the firm he started in 1933 lives on with his son and grandson, who display his heirlooms in the lobby of San Francisco's Owen, Wickersham & Erickson.

Through three generations, the intrigue of intellectual property work -- and the satisfaction of practicing in their own small shop -- has never faded for the men of the Owen family.

"A lot of lawyers burn out early," said A. Donham's son, Melville, 80, who was at the helm for nearly a half-century before passing control of the firm to his son, Gregory. "But with trademarks, you are dealing with something new and protecting it and watching it grow."

Owen, Wickersham & Erickson has become something of an anachronism. The corps of classic San Francisco firms with which it emerged have gone global or extinct, with few exceptions. Yet as it celebrates its 80th anniversary, the nine-lawyer shop carries on, serving a mix of startups and Fortune 500 clients and regularly rejecting merger overtures from large national firms looking to plant a flag in San Francisco.

Its survival, coupled with its heritage, sets it apart. Although there have been a number of prominent examples of family-owned firms in the Bay Area -- including the Law Offices of Joseph L. Alioto and Angela Alioto and Hersh & Hersh -- IP lawyers are hard-pressed to name another clan like the Owens in their space.

There are lineages to be found in the histories of several native San Francisco firms, such as the Sutros of what was then Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro or the Townsends of the firm formerly known as Townsend and Townsend and Crew. But the anti-nepotism rules that became popular later in the 20th century have cut some of those family trees short. Lawrence Townsend, counsel at Owens, Wickersham & Erickson, is a fourth-generation IP specialist, but he could not join his family's firm, Townsend and Townsend and Crew. His office, like Gregory "Greg" Owen's, is furnished with his grandfather's desk.

The Owens have practiced IP law since before the term was coined, Greg noted, and their firm brought one of the field's defining cases. In 1980 name partner Robert Wickersham argued Diamond v. Diehr before the U.S. Supreme Court, winning a 5-4 ruling holding that a machine controlled by a computer program could be patented. The ruling is often cited in modern-day cases before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court as justices wrestle over what is patentable, said Michael Jacobs, co-founder of Morrison & Foerster's intellectual property practice group.

As Edward Reines, an IP partner at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, puts it: "Their firm was at the forefront of patent litigation before everybody got involved in patent litigation."

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Morrison & Foerster
  • Townsend and Townsend and Crew
  • Weil, Gotshal & Manges

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Jason Doiy/The Recorder A
  • Townsends Inc.
  • CooperVision and Sherwin-Williams Co. Aided
  • Sanrio Company Inc.
  • Weil Gotshal & Manges
  • Owens, Wickersham & Erickson
  • Pillsbury Madison & Sutro
  • Angela Alioto and Hersh & Hersh
  • Owen, Wickersham & Erickson Image
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Boy Scouts of America
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Key categories

    
  • Patent

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  2. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  3. Budget Plan Contains Funds to Reassign 26,000 18-B Cases
    •      
  4. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  5. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

With Prison Looming, Marshall Mounts Bid for Reversal
  •      
    • Subscription Required

NYLJ 100

Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement

Pa. Senate Mulling Bill Aimed at Redefining Child Abuse

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

DA Rosemary Lehmberg Faces Second Removal Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media