Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • Top Rated Lawyers
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > After Gender Bias Win, Firm Goes After Another Drugmaker

Font Size: increase font decrease font

After Gender Bias Win, Firm Goes After Another Drugmaker

By Vanessa Blum Contact All Articles 

The Recorder

February 11, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Janette Wipper, Sanford Heisler managing partner

Janette Wipper, Sanford Heisler managing partner
Image: courtesy photo

SAN FRANCISCO — The plaintiffs lawyers that once secured the largest-ever award in a gender discrimination suit from a Cravath, Swaine & Moore client have a new target: Japanese pharmaceutical firm Daiichi Sankyo.

In a complaint filed Monday in the Northern District of California, six women represented by the employment law boutique Sanford Heisler accuse Daiichi Sankyo Co. of underpaying female sales reps, failing to promote them along with male colleagues, and discriminating against pregnant employees and working mothers.

The firm's sales strategy, the complaint alleges, relies on using attractive women to promote drugs, and male executives treat female employees as "props."

Instead of rewarding women for their success, male managers promoted less-qualified men and punished women who availed themselves of maternity leave or flexible work arrangements.

Daiichi Sankyo's actions are a "primer on how a company should not operate or treat female employees," states the complaint in Wellens v. Daiichi Sankyo, 13-581. Janette Wipper, managing partner of Sanford Heisler's San Francisco office, said the pharmaceutical industry has a pattern of gender discrimination in its sales ranks.

"Women don't receive the same compensation, and they don't receive the same promotional opportunities," Wipper said. "If they become pregnant, all of these issues are really exacerbated."

Wipper worked on a similar case against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., which resulted in a record jury verdict of $250 million in 2010 and ultimately settled for roughly $175 million. To settle the case, Novartis, represented by Cravath, agreed to pay more than $100 million to class members and to implement new policies for training, evaluating and promoting employees.

A spokeswoman for Daiichi Sankyo, which has U.S. headquarters in New Jersey, said in an email that the drugmaker complies with all laws regarding equal opportunity and nondiscrimination.

The company employs approximately 3,000 people in the United States and sells drugs to treat cardiovascular disease, diabetes and melanoma.

Name plaintiff Sara Wellens, a current employee in Northern California, contends in the suit that she joined Daiichi Sankyo with three years of experience and earned a ranking of nine out of 500 sales reps at her level.

However, while men were fast-tracked for promotion and received perks and mentoring, Wellens claims she was held back because she became pregnant and took maternity leave.

After she returned, a male supervisor referred to Wellens as a "baby-maker," and an HR employee instructed her that breast-feeding could not interfere with work-related events, the suit alleges.

Other female plaintiffs said they were demoted, fired or forced to resign due to discrimination.

"All of the plaintiffs are very strong performers and really gave a lot to the company," Wipper said. "That wasn't recognized through pay or promotional opportunities."



Subscribe to The Recorder

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Cravath, Swaine & Moore

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • HR
  • Cravath Swaine & Moore
  • Daiichi Sankyo
  • Novartis International AG

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  2. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  3. Lawyers' Pro Bono Hours, Contributions, Will Be Public
    •      
  4. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  5. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media