Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Large Firm
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Technology
    • Washington
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • lawjobs.com
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Resume
    • The Careerist Blog
    • News & Views
  • LawCatalog Store
    • Books Online
    • Best-Selling Books
    • Books
    • Directories
    • E-Newsletters
    • Magazines
    • Newspapers
    • Newsletters
    • Surveys
    • Research Services
    • Webinars
    • Events
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
  • email
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • alert
  • rss

Law.com Home > Should Law Schools Tell Students to Go Away?

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Should Law Schools Tell Students to Go Away?

Professors propose giving partial refund -- and the boot -- to struggling first-years

By Christian Nolan All Articles 

The Connecticut Law Tribune

December 29, 2011

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (2)
 


image: Image Club Clip Art

The thought may be enough to make law school deans cringe and prospective -- but wary -- law students applaud. Two Yale University Law School professors have suggested that law schools pay students to leave.

Not all students, of course. Just those whose first-year work indicates that they might not be able to hack it over the long haul.

"A half-tuition rebate splits the loss of an aborted legal career between the school and the student," writes law professors Akhil Reed Amar and Ian Ayres in an essay titled "Paying Students to Quit Law School." "Each has skin in the game, so students will not go to law school lightly, and law schools will have better incentives not to admit students likely to fail."

The professors suggest that at the end of a law student's first year, law school officials sit down with the student and assess his or her grades and future prospects in comparison to past students at that stage.

"The idea is to mark the end of the first year, after students have received their grades, as a salient decision-making point," write the professors in the essay that can be found on Yale Law School's website or at slate.com. "At that time, students will have learned more about their legal abilities and inclinations. Law schools will also have learned more about each student's abilities, and schools could now disclose how previous students with similar first-year grades fared after graduation."

At the root of the law professors' proposal is the notion that law schools do not fairly represent the past successes and failures of prior students, which prevents prospective students from making a fully informed decision to attend law school. That argument has become the gist of a nationwide debate, as the American Bar Association and other groups have pressured law schools into providing more accurate statistical reports on how students fare after graduation.

Critics point to thousands of recent graduates who left law school with tens of thousands of dollars in debt and without much prospect of finding full-time work in the profession.

"Anyone who starts law school with less than a 50 percent chance of passing the bar within three years of graduation should be required to sign a special waiver that he has been informed about the riskiness of his education investment," the professors write. "Warning high-risk applicants before they matriculate helps them protect themselves and reduces the government's risk of unpaid loans in the future."

'SOBER REASSESSMENT'

Brad Saxton, dean of Quinnipiac University School of Law, and Arthur Gaudio, dean of Western New England School of Law, declined interviews for this article. Jeremy Paul, dean of the University of Connecticut's School of Law, however, praised the cleverness of the proposal.

"I applaud them for their creativity and the idea that they're encouraging students at the end of their first year to do a sober reassessment but there's a lot more to that reassessment," said Paul. For example, Paul said he believes a law degree is marketable in fields other than practicing law. So he would be wary about driving away every student who might not make a good lawyer.

"One thing I always tell my students is, the first year of law school is very challenging, it takes a lot out of you, and while you're doing it, the last thing you should be doing is worrying whether law is right for me," said Paul. "You want to get through the first year and do as well as you can. In the summer after the first year, think about it, reflect. Does this direction make sense for me?"

The two law professors, Amar and Ayres, went to law school together at Yale in the mid-1980s and often discuss these kinds of issues.

"We share a sense that law schools need to seriously confront issues facing current law school students, applicants and recent graduates," Amar told the Connecticut Law Tribune. "In particular, schools need to make sure that applicants and law students get reliable information about their financial prospects."

Amar said the feedback so far is positive, in that their essay has provoked discussion and debate.

He further believes that the idea of 50 percent reimbursement after the first year for a law student choosing to leave is economically feasible for law schools.

"We think excellent law schools with proper business models could indeed feasibly implement our ideas," said Amar, who teaches constitutional law. "Perhaps a few schools at first, and slowly, with more modest rebates than we propose, and then more schools offering bigger rebates as the system proves its effectiveness and viability in practice, as we believe it would."

Paul, however, said rebates would be much more economically feasible for a school of Yale's stature than other schools. "For Yale, it's very economically feasible because almost nobody would do it."

On the flip side, schools whose graduates pass the bar exam at lower rates or who are not hired as frequently for high-paying jobs might take a bigger financial hit. "I want to counsel people very carefully," said Paul, "but I don't want to coax them into giving up."



Subscribe to The Connecticut Law Tribune

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Caroline

    December 30, 2011 05:07 PM

    What about the option of allowing students who have completed their first year of law school but decided not pursue their J.D. the option of taking a Masters degree in Law? Many years ago a number of schools were looking at this option. I am aware of two schools that offer this degree – though perhaps not with this particular approach in mind. If one planned to pursue a career related to law, in government, journalism, advanced paralegal positions, etc., this training would be nearly as useful as completing a J.D. without the outrageous cost, corresponding debt, or investment of time.

  • Garrett

    December 29, 2011 03:32 PM

    What disturbs me about the professors essay is they seem to advocate changing roles of motivating students to do better, to harbingers of demotivating students after the first year. Think what would have happened to the Detroit Lions 2008 0-16 record by this same thought process. The NFL Commissioner did not suggest the Lions quit their football program. The idea of a professor, in a role of leadership, should be to motivate and bring out the best of their students, wouldn’t you agree?



    The professors use of the word “bribe” twice in their essay leads me to believe that is the underlying intent of the commentary; to subjectively eject students after one year of what could be questionable grades. Whereas, they used “rebate” nine times and, in my opinion, used in proper context where the decision is based on the student’s self assessment to reevaluate their pursuit of the legal profession.



    It is not uncommon for a student to quit college to pursue other dreams or ideas after one year. But need to realize it is done at their own vices. They are not bribed to quit.



    I think back to when my cousin graduated from medical school at the University of Michigan. It took her longer to go through school and her residency because she was raising a young family. In the end, she made it through and now has her own practice. What if she was “bribed” to quit after the first year? Where would she be today, let alone the countless patients she has helped.



    To say that, “…[Paul] believes a law degree is marketable in fields other than practicing law.” Is right on.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Yale University
  • American Bar Association
  • Quinnipiac University School
  • University of Connecticut
  • Yale University
  • American Bar Association
  • Quinnipiac University School
  • University of Connecticut

Key categories

    
  • Law Schools
  • Law Schools

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Donovan Criticizes Secret Payoff to Lopez Victims
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Real Estate Lawyers Target Closing Vendors
    •      
  4. Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
    •      
  5. New District Judge Takes Firm Line on Attorney Conduct
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Law.com Network
  • ADVERTISE

law.com

  • Tour the New Site
  • Newswire
  • Special Reports
  • International News
  • Lists, Surveys & Rankings
  • Legal Blogs
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Site Map

alm national

  • The American Lawyer
  • The Am Law Litigation Daily
  • Corporate Counsel
  • Law Technology News
  • The National Law Journal

alm regional

  • Connecticut Law Tribune
  • Daily Business Review (FL)
  • Delaware Law Weekly
  • Daily Report (GA)
  • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
  • New Jersey Law Journal
  • New York Law Journal
  • GC New York
  • The Recorder (CA)
  • Texas Lawyer
  • The Asian Lawyer
  • Focus Europe

directories

  • ALM Experts
  • LegalTech® Directory
  • In-House Law Departments at the Top 500 Companies
  • Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Top Rated Lawyers
  • The American Lawyer Legal Recruiter's Directory
  • Corporate Counsel Top Rated Lawyers
  • The National Law Journal Leadership Profiles
  • National Directory of Minority Attorneys
  • Go-To Law firms of the Top 500 Companies

books & newsletters

  • Best-Selling Books
  • Publication E-Alerts
  • Law Journal Newsletters
  • LawCatalog Store
  • Law Journal Press Online

research

  • ALM Legal Intelligence
  • Court Reporters
  • MA 3000
  • Verdict Search
  • ALM Experts
  • Legal Dictionary
  • Smart Litigator

events & conferences

  • ALM Events
  • LegalTech®
  • Virtual LegalTech®
  • Virtual Events
  • Webinars & Online Events
  • Insight Information

reprints

  • Reprints

online cle

  • CLE Center

career

  • Lawjobs
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions |  ALM User License Agreement