Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • Top Rated Lawyers
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > Mandatory Retirement Policy a Factor in 7 Partners Leaving Firm

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Mandatory Retirement Policy a Factor in 7 Partners Leaving Firm

24 attorneys leave Mendes & Mount to establish aviation boutique

By Nate Raymond All Articles 

New York Law Journal

May 18, 2010

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 

Related Items

  • Boutiques Slicing Into Big Firms' Pie

Seven partners at Mendes & Mount have departed to launch a boutique after at least one of the partners failed to persuade the firm to amend its mandatory retirement policy.

The new firm, Fitzpatrick & Hunt, Tucker, Collier, Pagano, Aubert, consists of the bulk of Mendes & Mounts' aviation practice and will have offices in New York and Los Angeles, said partner Ralph V. Pagano. The firm will be made up of 24 lawyers from Mendes & Mount, including the partners, one of whom joins as special counsel. Mendes & Mount will be left with about 109 lawyers.

"It's a pretty big break-off," Pagano said.

Anthony Spain, the chairman of Mendes & Mount, said in an e-mail that the firm "continues to have a strong and viable aviation practice group and we anticipate that the departures will have a minimal or negligible impact on the ongoing business of the firm." The firm's website lists three lawyers in the practice. John P. Falcone, now at Biedermann, Reif, Hoenig & Ruff in Manhattan, confirmed Monday he will join Mendes as an equity partner this week to head the aviation practice. He declined further comment.

Fitzpatrick & Hunt will focus primarily on representing aircraft product manufacturers in products liability suits. Garrett J. Fitzpatrick in New York will be managing partner. Pagano said all of their clients and most matters have followed them to the new firm.

While the Mendes & Mount partners left for various reasons, Pagano said one of the main issues stemmed from the firm's policy of requiring partners to retire at 65.

In December, the most senior member of the group, James W. Hunt, was forced to retire and become a contract partner, according to Pagano. Three years earlier, Hunt was relieved as head of the practice in the Los Angeles office after hitting 62, which Mendes maintains as a "step-down" age," Pagano said.

Meanwhile, Fitzpatrick, who headed the practice in New York, was set to hit 62 this year, which would mean stepping down as leader of that group, Pagano said.

Hunt had discussed with Mendes & Mount's management committee last year whether it could amend the partnership agreement to eliminate the retirement policy, according to Pagano.

"They were not receptive to it," he said.

The aviation partners gave notice March 9 and then solicited clients and staff about joining them at their new firm. The group was advised by Arthur Ciampi, a partnership law expert at Ciampi LLC in Manhattan and a New York Law Journal columnist.

The events at Mendes & Mount come at a time of renewed attention to mandatory retirement policies. In January, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Kelley Drye & Warren for age discrimination over its policy of de-equitizing partners at 70.

Both the New York State Bar and the American Bar associations in 2007 came out against the policies, with advocates contending they discriminate against older lawyers. But while a few firms dropped the requirement, many in New York and nationally continue to enforce them. A 2008 survey by Altman Weil Publications Inc. found that 58 percent of responding firms with more than 100 lawyers had a mandatory retirement policy.

James Cotterman, a consultant at Altman Weil, said what happened at Mendes & Mount was "certainly consistent with the risks firms face if they don't address mandatory retirement," that partners who still had the interest and ability to keep working would seek out opportunities to continue to do so, possibly taking business with them.

"I would have probably expected them to take [their practice] to another firm," he said. "But certainly if the practice is sufficient enough and they have a team of people who support that practice," Cotterman said, departing attorneys could start their own firms.

Like other firms, Mendes & Mount adopted its retirement policy so that younger partners would not face a "logjam" as they climbed through the ranks, said Pagano.

He said while the mandatory retirement age was a factor for Hunt and Fitzpatrick, there were different concerns for other partners. In his case, Pagano said he saw the opportunity to launch a more nimble firm.

"It should allow us to be more aggressive with flat fees and alternative fees, which many of our clients are demanding," he said.

Ciampi said that in the past 18 months he has seen an uptick in advising lawyers interested in spinning out of large firms and creating boutiques.

Five-partner Chaffetz Lindsey launched in May 2009 with partners from Clifford Chance in New York. In September, four-partner Molo Lamken opened in New York and Washington, D.C., with lawyers from Shearman & Sterling and Baker Botts.

"I think they feel they could do it better themselves," Ciampi said.



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Violet Petran

    June 02, 2010 08:55 PM

    I think retirements are highly personal and need to be handled on an individual rather than systematic basis. People are different and to force retirements when individuals want to continue to contribute seems to be a horrible way to treat an employee. The old adage: respect your elders, comes to mind when dealing with retirement—there should be a tremendous amount of respect for retiring employees, and forced retirements and constructive discharges will hopefully be limited. I discussed your article in my blog: http://employment-law.legalmatch.com/2010/06/how-old-is-too-old-to-work.html

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Clifford Chance
  • Mendes & Mount
  • Shearman & Sterling
  • Baker Botts
  • Kelley Drye & Warren

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Mendes & Mounts
  • Fitzpatrick & Hunt
  • Partners Leaving Firm
  • Biedermann, Reif, Hoenig & Ruff
  • Ciampi
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  • American Bar
  • Altman Weil Publications
  • Mendes & Mounts
  • Fitzpatrick & Hunt
  • Biedermann, Reif, Hoenig & Ruff
  • Ciampi
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  • New York State Bar
  • American Bar
  • Altman Weil Publications

Key categories

    
  • retirement
  • soccer / football
  • lawyer
  • company information
  • retirement
  • lawyer
  • company information

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  2. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  3. Budget Plan Contains Funds to Reassign 26,000 18-B Cases
    •      
  4. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  5. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Texas DA Faces Removal Suits Over DWI, Alleged Misconduct
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media