Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > Supreme Court Keeps $18 Million Internet Copyright Settlement Alive

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Supreme Court Keeps $18 Million Internet Copyright Settlement Alive

By Marcia Coyle All Articles 

The National Law Journal

March 3, 2010

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • Court-Appointed Supreme Court Counsel Takes On Copyright Case
  • Supreme Court Grants Copyright Case

An $18 million settlement of a copyright infringement suit between Internet publishers and freelance writers is back on track because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday.

In Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick, the justices, in an 8-0 decision, held that the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was wrong when it ruled in 2008 that the district court lacked jurisdiction to certify the class or the settlement in the litigation. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a former 2nd Circuit judge, did not participate in the high court case.

The 2005 settlement followed the Supreme Court's decision in 2001 in New York Times Co. v. Tasini, in which the justices held that the federal Copyright Act does not permit publishers to reproduce freelance works electronically without specific permission from the authors. After Tasini, four infringement class actions were consolidated in the Southern District of New York. The district court subsequently certified the class and settlement. Ten authors objected to certification on the grounds that it was unfair.

On appeal, the 2nd Circuit, on its own, raised the issue of whether the district court had jurisdiction over infringement claims involving unregistered copyrights. Section 411(a) of the Copyright Act requires copyright holders to register their works before suing for copyright infringement. The appellate court held that each claim in the class must meet that registration requirement and because there were unregistered works in the class, there was no subject-matter jurisdiction.

The plaintiffs, defendants and objectors successfully petitioned the Supreme Court for review. Because all three parties disagreed with the 2nd Circuit decision, the justices appointed Deborah Jones Merritt of Ohio State University Moritz College of Law to argue in support of the appellate court ruling.

In Tuesday's ruling (pdf), Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court, said Section 411(a) "imposes a precondition to filing a claim that is not clearly labeled jurisdictional, is not located in a jurisdiction-granting provision, and admits of congressionally authorized exceptions."

A copyright holder's failure to comply with the registration requirement, he wrote, does not restrict a federal court's jurisdiction over claims involving unregistered works.

Charles Sims, partner at New York's Proskauer Rose, who argued for reversal of the 2nd Circuit decision, said, "From the day we lost in the 2nd Circuit, I thought we would get cert and win. Unanimous is very sweet."

The case now returns to the appellate court on the merits of the appeal, he said, adding, "There were 20,000 authors and newspapers and databases that were in agreement this was a wonderful settlement. There were 10 objectors and because of those, authors have been waiting and waiting for their money. It's a great example of Jarndyce and Jarndyce" (the long-running case in Charles Dickens' "Bleak House").

 



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Proskauer Rose
  • Proskauer Rose

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Ohio State University Moritz College
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • 2nd Circuit
  • Reed Elsevier
  • U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
  • New York Times Co.
  • Charles Dickens
  • Bleak House
  • Ohio State University Moritz College
  • 2nd Circuit
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • Reed Elsevier
  • U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
  • New York Times Co.
  • Charles Dickens
  • Bleak House

Key categories

    
  • Copyright
  • Copyright

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  4. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  5. Law for Laymen
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media