Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > Case on Christian Law Student Group Gets Supreme Court Star Power

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Case on Christian Law Student Group Gets Supreme Court Star Power

By Marcia Coyle All Articles 

The National Law Journal

January 15, 2010

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Related Items

  • Supreme Court Takes Up Law School Case on Christian Student Group

In the Supreme Court battle between the Christian Legal Society and the University of California Hastings College of Law -- a potentially major First Amendment challenge on this term's docket -- both sides have added star legal talent to handle the likely April arguments.

Christian Legal Society has brought on board, as lead counsel, former federal appellate judge Michael McConnell, who is now director of the Constitutional Law Center at Stanford Law School. Hastings has added former Solicitor General Gregory Garre, chair of Latham & Watkins' Supreme Court and Appellate Practice Group. And the Hastings gay and lesbian student organization, Hastings Outlaw, has brought in Paul Smith, chair of the Appellate and Supreme Court Practice at Jenner & Block.

The high court case, Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, asks the justices whether a public university law school with a non-discrimination policy can refuse to fund a religious student group because the group requires its officers and voting members to agree with its core religious beliefs, thereby excluding gay and lesbian students.

"Mike will indeed be arguing the case," said Gregory Baylor, senior legal counsel at the Alliance Defense Fund, which represented the Christian Legal Society in the lower courts.

Before joining Stanford last year, McConnell was a judge on the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. He is a nationally-known religion clause scholar and has argued 11 cases in the Supreme Court.

McConnell said he is working pro bono for CLS and the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic is not involved in the case.

Ethan Schulman, partner in the San Francisco office of Crowell & Moring, represented Hastings College of Law in the district court litigation and on appeal to the 9th Circuit.

Schulman said he has never argued in the Supreme Court. "I was hoping," he chuckled. "But at the end of the day, it's what's best for the client." And what was best was Garre, who will be working with another Latham high court veteran, Maureen Mahoney, added Schulman.

Garre, who has argued 27 Supreme Court cases, has served as solicitor general, principal deputy solicitor general and an assistant to the solicitor general.

Hastings Outlaw, the student group that intervened on the law school's side, has been represented by the National Center for Lesbian Rights in San Francisco.

Shannon Price Minter, the Center's legal director, said the Center asked Smith to help with the case. "We just wanted to ensure the student group has the very best representation," he said. "Now that we're at the Supreme Court, we wanted someone who regularly practices there and given his expertise in First Amendment issues, Paul seemed like a very logical choice. We don't anticipate seeking argument time. We want to make sure the briefs are first rate."

Last March, the 9th Circuit affirmed a district court ruling in favor of the law school. The three-judge panel, in an unsigned opinion, said, "Hastings imposes an open membership rule on all student groups -- all groups must accept all comers as voting members even if those individuals disagree with the mission of the group. The conditions on recognition are therefore viewpoint neutral and reasonable."

This article first appeared on The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • University of California
  • Supreme Court
  • Christian Legal Society
  • Latham & Watkins
  • Jenner & Block
  • Alliance Defense Fund
  • U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic
  • Crowell & Moring
  • National Center for Lesbian Rights
  • Legal Times

Key categories

    
  • judiciary (system of justice)
  • university
  • gays and lesbians
  • students
  • school
  • litigation
  • lawyer

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices
    •      
  2. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  3. Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit
    •      
  4. Lawyers Sanctioned Over Porn Lawsuits File Appeal
    •      
  5. Law for Laymen
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media