A New York judge has thrown out a rabbinical court's arbitration award, finding that the court's refusal to allow the claimant to select his own counsel violated state law, notwithstanding the fact that the claimant participated in the proceeding without objection. The decision constitutes the first time a New York court has addressed in a written opinion the issue of whether an arbitration panel can require that attorneys appearing before them must receive their approval.
Party's Right to Counsel Found Violated by a Rabbinical Court
New York Law Journal
November 24, 2009