Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • Top Rated Lawyers
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > Marriage Equality Opponents Ask Supreme Court to Shield Their Identities

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Marriage Equality Opponents Ask Supreme Court to Shield Their Identities

By Amanda Bronstad All Articles 

The National Law Journal

November 10, 2009

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 

Related Items

  • Discovery Fight in Suit Challenging Calif. Ban on Gay Marriages
  • Calif. Supreme Court: Religion Not a Shield for Discrimination

Protect Marriage Washington has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to block the public release of the names and other personal information of 138,000 people who signed a petition the goal of which was to strip gay and lesbian couples of the same domestic partnership rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples in Washington state.

The drafters of Referendum 71, a recent ballot initiative, gained enough petition signatures to take the issue to the voters after the Washington Legislature passed a bill extending the domestic partnerships benefits to gays and lesbians. Under Washington law, people voting "yes" wanted to retain the benefits. On Nov. 3, "yes" votes outstripped "no" votes, 52.5 percent to 47.4 percent.

Groups in favor of retaining the benefits, including KnowThyNeighbor.org, have been demanding release of the names and addresses of those who signed the Referendum 71 petition.

On July 28, Protect Marriage Washington sued the state seeking injunctive relief to prevent releasing the names, addresses and other personal information of those who signed the petition. On Oct. 22, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, ruling that public disclosure of petition signers' identities was not subject to strict scrutiny, reversed a lower court that granted a preliminary injunction shielding the names.

On Nov. 6, Protect Marriage Washington petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the 9th Circuit.

"We feel that there is a strong First Amendment interest here -- that the petition signers have -- in not having their identity and their beliefs compelled to be released to the public," said James Bopp Jr. of Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom in Terre Haute, Ind., who represents Protect Marriage Washington. "And apparently the 9th Circuit really discounted that interest."

Bopp, who is general counsel of the James Madison Center for Free Speech, said that petition signers continue to receive threats, harassment and intimidation not unlike the behavior against people who donated money in support of last year's California vote on Proposition 8, which overturned a California Supreme Court ruling extending marriage benefits to lesbians and gays.

The court petition said, for instance, that Larry Stickney, campaign manager for Protect Marriage Washington, received an e-mail warning to avoid areas of Washington and another e-mail threatening to hurt his family.

"Our view, and that of the Attorney General, is that initiative and referendum petitions clearly fall within the definition of public records and should be releasable," Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed said in a prepared statement. "Just as with legislative bill sponsors, the people of Washington want to know who is responsible for measures that are being adopted or rejected via citizen-legislating."

Tom Lang, co-director of KnowThyNeighbor.org, which has campaigned to release nearly 1 million names in recent years related to ballot initiatives addressing gay rights across the country, said that the names of people who sign referenda in Washington have always been made public.

"We don't believe that people who engaged in an activity like starting the process to take people's rights away should be able to exist under the cover of darkness," he said. "And that's exactly what's happening in Washington."



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Laura

    November 10, 2009 12:44 PM

    I think the request for shielding is coming from marriage equality *opponents*, not proponents.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  2. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  3. Budget Plan Contains Funds to Reassign 26,000 18-B Cases
    •      
  4. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
  5. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

With Prison Looming, Marshall Mounts Bid for Reversal
  •      
    • Subscription Required

NYLJ 100

Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement

Pa. Senate Mulling Bill Aimed at Redefining Child Abuse

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

DA Rosemary Lehmberg Faces Second Removal Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media