Incisive Media's Law.com
  • Law.com Network
  • Legal Web
Register for Law.com Newswire
Newsletters
RSS

Law.com Home > Note to Supreme Court Justices: Specter Saw You on TV

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Note to Supreme Court Justices: Specter Saw You on TV

David Ingram

The National Law Journal

November 06, 2009

  • deliciousdel.icio.us
  • digg Digg
  • redditReddit
  • facebookFacebook
  • googleGoogle Bookmarks
  • newsvineNewsvine
  • linkedinLinkedIn
  • mixxMixx
  • stumbleuponStumbleupon
  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Post a Comment

Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., has been a longtime advocate of televising sessions of the U.S. Supreme Court, a quest that has repeatedly fallen on deaf ears across First Street NE.

But Specter noted Thursday that the justices haven't exactly been camera shy.

In a speech on the Senate floor, he said that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justice John Paul Stevens have appeared in interviews on ABC's "Primetime," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on CBS News, Justice Stephen Breyer on "Fox News Sunday," and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas on CBS's "60 Minutes." All the justices, he added, were recently interviewed on C-SPAN.

"We cannot accept the justices' plea for anonymity when they so regularly appear before the camera," Specter said in his prepared remarks.

The former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee is hoping to line up his colleagues behind a resolution he introduced Thursday that would get the "sense of the Senate" on cameras in the Court. He so far has seven co-sponsors, including Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who is the Senate's No. 2 Democrat, and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a former state Supreme Court justice. No vote on the resolution has been scheduled.

Specter pointed to several reasons why he thinks the tide is turning: camera opponent David Souter has retired from the Court, several sitting justices said during their confirmation hearings that they would be open to televising sessions, and the new high court of the United Kingdom allows cameras.

Previously, Specter has pushed legislation that would require the Supreme Court to allow television coverage, but the legislation never won Senate approval. The new resolution, he said, is a more "restrained and modest approach."

Click here (PDF) for a copy of Specter's prepared speech, which doubles as a critique of some of the Court's recent rulings and of its reduced workload.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Post a Comment

Related Items

  • The Supreme Court, as Seen on Television

Advertisement

Top Stories From Law.com

Legal Technology

  • Public Performance in the Digital Age

Corporate Counsel

  • United Technologies Takes a Stand, Puts Billable Hour 'on Life Support'

Small Firm Business

  • Holiday Parties: Keeping Expenses Low and Deductibility High

Advertisement

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS >>

POST A JOB >>

Advertisement

About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions
Close [ X ]