Incisive Media's Law.com
  • Law.com Network
  • Legal Web
Register for Law.com Newswire
Newsletters
RSS

Law.com Home > Fla. Appeals Court Reverses $24.2 Million Verdict in Asbestos Case

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Fla. Appeals Court Reverses $24.2 Million Verdict in Asbestos Case

Jordana Mishory

Daily Business Review

October 29, 2009

  • deliciousdel.icio.us
  • digg Digg
  • redditReddit
  • facebookFacebook
  • googleGoogle Bookmarks
  • newsvineNewsvine
  • linkedinLinkedIn
  • mixxMixx
  • stumbleuponStumbleupon
  • twitterTwitter
  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Post a Comment

The 3rd District Court of Appeal reversed a $24.2 million verdict Wednesday, striking a Miami-Dade jury award to a Weston, Fla., surgeon who claimed asbestos exposure caused his terminal cancer.

In a unanimous unsigned opinion, the three-judge panel remanded the products liability lawsuit by Dr. Stephen Guilder against Honeywell International and ordered a new trial.

Guilder won one of the highest compensatory damage awards against a single defendant in a mesothelioma case in April 2008. He died before the appeal was decided.

He claimed he developed the rare peritoneal mesothelioma from exposure to asbestos by remodeling an attic, working in road construction and repairing cars in the 1970s and 1980s.

The doctor sued Honeywell, whose subsidiary Bendix made brakes, and 15 other defendants. A number of the defendants entered confidential pretrial settlements.

The jury verdict included a $10.4 million award for Guilder's children for loss of parental consortium.

The 3rd DCA reversed on several grounds, agreeing with Honeywell that Senior Judge Richard Yale Feder erred by allowing into evidence a prejudicial letter from a Bendix employee to an asbestos supplier in the 1960s which illustrated Honeywell's knowledge of asbestos dangers. The appellate court ruled the judge should have redacted a prejudicial section.

The three-judge panel also determined Feder should have included third parties on the verdict form so jurors could apportion comparative fault and Guilder's children were not entitled to loss of consortium.

The court also ruled Honeywell was entitled to have the verdict set off by the $2.8 million Guilder obtained in settlements with other defendants.

Guilder's attorney, David Jagolinzer of the Ferraro Law Firm in Miami, said, "It's just a shame; the family is suffering a lot now."

White & Case partner Raoul Cantero of Miami, who argued for Honeywell, deferred to the company for comment. Honeywell spokeswoman Victoria Streitfeld said the company was pleased by the decision.

The case was decided by Judges David Gersten, Barbara Lagoa and Leslie Rothenberg.



Subscribe to Daily Business Review

  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Post a Comment

Related Items

  • Lawyers' Gamble on Asbestos Trial Pays Off for Plaintiffs

Advertisement

Top Stories From Law.com

Legal Technology

  • LegalTech New York: That's a Wrap

Corporate Counsel

  • This Boot's for You: Former Amkor Technology General Counsel Disbarred

Small Firm Business

  • Wealth Management Group Leaving Wilson for Regional Firm

Advertisement

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS >>

POST A JOB >>

Advertisement

About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions
Close [ X ]