Incisive Media's Law.com
  • Law.com Network
  • Legal Web
Register for Law.com Newswire
Newsletters
RSS

Law.com Home > Second Time's the Charm for Plaintiffs in WaMu Complaint

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Second Time's the Charm for Plaintiffs in WaMu Complaint

Andrew Longstreth

The American Lawyer

October 29, 2009

  • deliciousdel.icio.us
  • digg Digg
  • redditReddit
  • facebookFacebook
  • googleGoogle Bookmarks
  • newsvineNewsvine
  • linkedinLinkedIn
  • mixxMixx
  • stumbleuponStumbleupon
  • twitterTwitter
  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Post a Comment

Like some editors we know, many judges have a sore spot for disorganized, confusing or wordy complaints. As we reported earlier this year, Seattle federal district court Judge Marsha Pechman didn't much care for how Bernstein Litowitz Berger and Grossmann presented their allegations in a 388-page complaint against various former Washington Mutual officers and directors, underwriters and the auditing firm Deloitte & Touche. But she apparently liked the revision. In a decision issued on Tuesday, Pechman allowed most of the claims to move forward and declined to dismiss any of the defendants from the case.

The allegations in the case center on Washington Mutual's residential lending practices. The plaintiffs contend that the bank's standards were relaxed to meet consumer demand and bolster the company's stock price. While Pechman found the first complaint "verbose" and "disorganized," she described the allegations in the 267-page amended complaint as "cogent and concise."

Chad Johnson, a partner at Bernstein Litowtiz, said in an e-mail to us: "We are pleased that the judge took a pragmatic approach to the matter and agreed that the case can move forward because the complaint already shows a strong indication of fraud at the top level of WaMu's management -- and the judge similarly sustained the complaint against Wall Street investment banks and the auditor Deloitte, all of whom failed in their duty to protect investors from the fraud at WaMu."

The lineup for the defendants includes Simpson Thacher & Bartlett attorneys Barry Ostrager and Rob Pfister for former WaMu officers; Ronald Berenstain of Perkins Coie for former WaMu outside directors; Barry Kaplan of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati for former WaMu CEO Kerry Killinger; Peter Wald of Latham & Watkins for Deloitte; and Jonathan Dickey of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher for the underwriters.

We left messages for each camp.

This article first appeared on The Am Law Litigation Daily blog on AmericanLawyer.com.

  • Print
  • Share
  • Email
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Post a Comment

Advertisement

Top Stories From Law.com

Legal Technology

  • LegalTech New York: That's a Wrap

Corporate Counsel

  • This Boot's for You: Former Amkor Technology General Counsel Disbarred

Small Firm Business

  • Wealth Management Group Leaving Wilson for Regional Firm

Advertisement

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS >>

POST A JOB >>

Advertisement

About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions
Close [ X ]