Law.com
  • News
    • Newswire
    • Supreme Court
    • International
    • Legal Blog Watch
    • The Hot Seat
    • Video
  • Publications
    • The American Lawyer
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Law Technology News
    • The National Law Journal
    • New York Law Journal
    • New Jersey Law Journal
    • Connecticut Law Tribune
    • The Legal Intelligencer (PA)
    • Daily Business Review (FL)
    • Delaware Law Weekly
    • Daily Report (GA)
    • The Recorder (CA)
    • Texas Lawyer
    • Publication E-Alerts
    • More Publication Sites
  • Legal Research & Directories
    • Books Online
    • Smart Litigator
    • ALM Experts
    • Verdict Search
    • Court Reporters
    • Legal Dictionary
    • LegalTech® Directory
    • Newsletters
    • More Directories
  • Surveys, Lists & Rankings
    • Amlaw 100
    • NLJ 250
    • Global 100
    • The A-List
    • ALM Legal Intelligence
    • Surveys
    • Top Rated Lawyers
    • More Lists & Rankings
  • Special Reports
  • lawjobs.com
  • LawCatalog Store
  • CLE & Events
    • CLE Center
    • ALM Events
    • LegalTech
    • Virtual LegalTech
    • Insight Legal Events
    • Webinars
Home
 
Article
Twitter LinkedIn RSS
Sign Up for Newsletters

Law.com Home > 11th Circuit Sides With Defense Attorney Over Legal Fees

Font Size: increase font decrease font

11th Circuit Sides With Defense Attorney Over Legal Fees

By John Pacenti All Articles 

Daily Business Review

October 27, 2009

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 

In a case of first impression, a federal appellate court ruled Monday in the prosecution of prominent Miami attorney Ben Kuehne that criminal defense lawyers can't be charged with taking ill-gotten proceeds from defendants as legal fees.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a decision by U.S. District Judge Marcia G. Cooke, who dismissed a money-laundering conspiracy count against the attorney for vetting money that went to Miami celebrity attorney Roy Black to defend Colombian drug kingpin Fabio Ochoa.

Kuehne, who has represented a number of high-profile clients including Vice President Al Gore in the 2000 presidential recount, was charged along with two Colombians. Prosecutors charged Kuehne knowingly sent drug money through Colombia's black market peso exchange to pay Black and his team.

Cooke ruled in December that defense attorneys are exempt from prosecution under the money-laundering statute. Congress in 1988 carved out an exemption for lawyers to protect a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel of their choice.

The Justice Department argued a U.S. Supreme Court decision in a forfeiture case negated the exemption and it didn't cover any fees involving tainted money. But 11th Circuit Judge Rosemary Barkett, writing for the unanimous panel, rejected the argument in a nine-page opinion.

"We do not believe Congress intended such an absurd result, which nullifies the provision and divorces it from its statutory context, thereby violating basic canons of statutory construction," Barkett wrote.

She emphasized Cooke was "eminently correct" in her decision.

Appellate Judge Frank Hull and U.S. District Judge Gordon Quist, a visiting jurist from Grand Rapids, Mich., concurred.

John Nields, Kuehne's lead attorney with the Howrey firm in Washington, D.C., said he was gratified by the court's decision.

The appellate court also is considering Cooke's decision to throw out all charges against co-defendant Gloria Velez, a Colombian accountant employed by Kuehne. Cooke ruled Velez's right to a speedy trial had been violated.

Also charged in the case is Colombian attorney Oscar Saldarriaga.

Miami criminal defense attorney David O. Markus, who helped write an amicus brief in the appeal for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said the decision "sends the message loud and clear to the government that it cannot trample on the Sixth Amendment and get away with it."



Subscribe to Daily Business Review

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • stefano

    October 27, 2009 12:30 PM

    Mr. Pacenti:



    The opinion reads "eminently correct" not "imminently correct." I trust that a correction is imminent. Thank you for an interesting article on a decision which never would have reached me but for your eminent prose.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Justice Department
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • National Association

Key categories

    
  • judiciary (system of justice)
  • crime
  • defendant
  • court preliminary
  • parliament
  • lawyer

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit
    •      
  2. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  3. Lawyers' Pro Bono Hours, Contributions, Will Be Public
    •      
  4. Lawyer Vanishes Leaving N.J. Firm With A Broken Settlement
    •      
  5. The 2013 Am Law 100
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media